Support The Forums:

The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation here

Class review: Protect Your House of Worship

This section is dedicated to all issues relating to training and tactics. Commercial advertisements and solicitation for your own classes are not
permitted.

Moderators: Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
rimfireOH
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:49 am
Location: NE Ohio

Class review: Protect Your House of Worship

Post by rimfireOH »

My youngest son made me aware of this class about 36 hours before it started and somehow I got registered before it filled up. Range 42 hosted this event at their Pearl Road (Medina) facility, in partnership with USCCA training. It was well-attended. I arrived a few minutes before it started and got one of the last seats, and yet people kept arriving for another 5-10 minutes and they brought in more chairs. This topic is clearly a hot one.

Protect Your House of Worship was a two-hour classroom training, mostly slides and lecture (but also great Q&A). I feel that it was an excellent introduction to church (synagogue, mosque, etc.) safety concepts for team members who are looking for ways to improve the security of their house of worship.

We focused on:
  • What to look for
    The instructors touched on risk factors to look for and indicators that someone might be looking to cause some trouble. We watched (repeatedly) a short video of the West Freeway Church of Christ shooting and made observations with an aim to improving our own awareness and response.
  • Emergency Operations Plan
    We looked at four parts of a proposed EOP (Deterrence, Protection, Response, Mitigation) and covered some specifics that might be relevant to our own situations.
  • Developing that plan
    We walked through seven steps to develop an EOP. I believe this might have been the most important section for me. It provided realistic, actionable "things to do", including table-top exercises (once the collaborative plan is developed), live walk-through exercises (and review) and a full-scale exercise with everyone involved. And it didn't end by telling us to put the plan on the shelf and let it collect dust. There was an emphasis on regular review, revising, maintaining and training against the plan. This periodic revisiting of the plan is extremely important, whether it's an EOP or usher training, first-aid responder training or even how you expect your church greeters to operate.
  • A Security Checklist
    We touched on outer doors, inner doors, safe rooms, not-safe rooms, lock-down procedures and active counter measures. This was another important topic -- having a response team trained in defensive skills and first aid. If there have been injuries, an on-the-scene first aid response might make the difference between going home or staying.
We did cover an individual first aid kit (for the gearheads in the room) and there are some good suggestions that I'm reviewing for additions to my own kit. An important reminder: don't include items in your kit that you don't know how to use. Get tourniquet training if you feel you must have one, but don't put one in your kit just because it's cool, without being trained on how to use one.

There was plenty of time for Q&A and many good questions were asked and many good answers provided. As usual during a USCCA-sponsored event, there was a recruitment/sales effort. And USCCA does has a good collection of other training and helpful resources related to this topic.

I don't know that everyone on your safety team needs to attend this class, but it wouldn't hurt. I can see a benefit to having 3-4 people on your team attend together and then meeting again soon thereafter to compare notes, highlights, specific items for review and action items.
I plan on using the EOP development steps to improve our own plan, and the materials and topics covered during this two-hour session will very likely improve that plan and our team.
Brian D.
Posts: 16477
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: SW Ohio

Re: Class review: Protect Your House of Worship

Post by Brian D. »

Sounds like a good class. I will say that it's pretty simple learning how to use a tourniquet. And can absolutely be life saving.
Quit worrying, hide your gun well, shut up, and CARRY that handgun!

********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
M-Quigley
Posts: 5019
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: Class review: Protect Your House of Worship

Post by M-Quigley »

One thing about tourniquets. There are tourniquets on ebay and Amazon that look exactly like well known brand name tourniquets but are cheaper, in some cases very inexpensive. The problem is depending on what manufacturer in China it comes from the quality ranges from excellent to total garbage when you actually try to use it. Using it for real is the wrong time to find out it's garbage.

Just as a test review I bought 3 different chinese made knock off tourniquets off of Ebay and Amazon, from 3 different sellers with ratings 90% or higher, and tested them. The problem with looking at reviews is customers say things like "It looks just like the expensive ones", or I haven't needed to use it yet so I don't know if it's good or not, but it looks good." :(

In testing, one broke right away, the other stretched when turning it and wouldn't achieve the right tension, but the 3rd one was excellent, and as good as the name brand tourniquet. It did however cost a whole dollar more than the others. :roll: All the subsequent ones I bought from from that source passed all the tests also, because I wanted to make sure it wasn't a fluke. So the bottom line is, if you can and don't want to take a chance pay a little more and get a well known name brand tourniquet.

IF you ignore the above advice and do buy a less expensive knock off, make sure it's from a good source before you have to depend on it for real. I can't recommend a brand because all the knock offs from all the sellers say "unbranded, but they obviously are not made at the same factory.
rimfireOH
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:49 am
Location: NE Ohio

Re: Class review: Protect Your House of Worship

Post by rimfireOH »

M-Quigley wrote: Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:55 am One thing about tourniquets. There are tourniquets on ebay and Amazon that look exactly like well known brand name tourniquets but are cheaper, in some cases very inexpensive. The problem is depending on what manufacturer in China it comes from the quality ranges from excellent to total garbage when you actually try to use it. Using it for real is the wrong time to find out it's garbage.
When we were discussing kit, the instructor raised this very same issue. Said it wasn’t worth gambling to save a few bucks (paraphrasing) and just buy the name brand.
M-Quigley
Posts: 5019
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: Class review: Protect Your House of Worship

Post by M-Quigley »

rimfireOH wrote: Fri Jun 13, 2025 6:14 am
M-Quigley wrote: Thu Jun 12, 2025 8:55 am One thing about tourniquets. There are tourniquets on ebay and Amazon that look exactly like well known brand name tourniquets but are cheaper, in some cases very inexpensive. The problem is depending on what manufacturer in China it comes from the quality ranges from excellent to total garbage when you actually try to use it. Using it for real is the wrong time to find out it's garbage.
When we were discussing kit, the instructor raised this very same issue. Said it wasn’t worth gambling to save a few bucks (paraphrasing) and just buy the name brand.
I totally agree. Most people who buy them for their own kit aren't going to be buying very many anyway, and might not have to actually use one for real and have to replace it. OTOH, if you do have to use one, you need to have confidence it won't break on you or not do the job. Being a cheap, I mean frugal person who likes to save money, I understand the temptation to save a little money, but not on a life or death item that has to work right.
The difference in cost for just one is not that bad to risk it, IMO.

Did the instructor use the name brand for training purposes? Simply for training only is one area that I guess might be a potential use for the knock offs, at least the ones that look and work exactly like the name brand.
Post Reply