Support The Forums:

The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation here

Sig 320 takes the US military cake???

This is where you can talk about all equipment issues; firearms, ammunition, magazines, care & repair, holsters, gun cases, etc.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
CCIman
Posts: 1823
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: SW Ohio

Sig 320 takes the US military cake???

Post by CCIman »

Just read on google news (Fox) that the military is "intending' to offer Sig the contract to make Sig320 the replacement for the current standard Beretta M9 sidearm.

"Modularity" seems to have tipped it. I'm sure there will be appeals or cotests by the other contenders. Seems that 9mm is to stay.
'CAN' does not equal "SHOULD'.
Tru-Heathen
Posts: 694
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 1:17 pm
Location: Hardin County

Re: Sig 320 takes the US military cake???

Post by Tru-Heathen »

Dupe.
A wayfarer should not walk unarmed,
But have his weapons to hand:
He knows not when he may need a spear,
Or what menace meet on the road.

- Verse 38 from the Havamal, the Wisdom of Odin.
concreteguy
Posts: 239
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:37 am
Location: Rushville

Re: Sig 320 takes the US military cake???

Post by concreteguy »

I'm liking mine so far. Prefer it over my M&P.
Post Reply