JSLACK7851 wrote:Wow, what a read.
I understand OFCC's need to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit. Since one was filed in Michigan. I see the similarities. Shouldn't the outcome of that lawsuit be learned b/4 turning everybody's world up side down?
Don't focus on the lawsuit I mentioned. It was one mere example of why we want to be able to decide what type of events are posted here, and this is not just about civil liability. Its about liability to the cause, liability to our legislative goals, or liability in terms of case law. If the Michigan issue results in bad case law for gun owners who is to blame? Most likely the people who turned a regular open carry event into "lets bring a long gun into a library to make a point" and maybe went too far.
Just think: We are on the brink of restaurant carry legislation that also contains positive changes to the vehicle transport law. If there were an open carry event that went sideways and some misinformed department decided to invoke mass arrests and it became headline news what potential impact would that have on our legislative goals right now? It's one thing is its a friendly restaurant, it's another if it causes that restaurant to call the police and get us on the news because they had no idea we were coming armed.
If someone comes to us and says "we're going to have a flash mob open carry walk at Bill's Donut Shop" then we need to evaluate it. If someone says "We want to have a regular open carry based Meet & Greet every 4th Tuesday of the month and Bill's Donuts likes our money and our guns" then we're talking about two different animals.
If anyone has a problem with us picking and choose the difference between these events and if they should be advertised here, then I can offer you no explanation other than we intend to do it for the sake of our cause.
Case in point: Some people believe that the repeated open carry walks in Lake County caused a property that turned out to be private property to get posted. Some people who have open carried into certain establishments have caused those establishments to post "No Guns" signs for
all of us.
I would think OFCC would become rich and famous should they be involved in such a lawsuit. The envy of the rest of the 2A org's. here in Ohio. Nobody gets noticed if they are not forerunners of what they believe in.
This is a somewhat narrow minded concept I guess. We don't get noticed if we're not forerunners, but we're not forerunners if we don't agree to allow anything imaginable happen on our organization's website? I believe this organization has created a rather professional reputation in the Statehouse, before numerous courts across the State of Ohio, and in the court of public opinion. We have a fiduciary responsibility to the dues paying members as a whole entity, including the substantial majority of them that are not represented here on the forums.
The belief that people get "rich and famous" through lawsuits is absurd. This organization has quite frankly spent literally thousands of dollars on lawsuits and has yet to win any financial payoff rewards.
The chances of us simply breaking even in Campbell, Ohio are 50/50 at best. The pie in the sky belief that being wrongfully sued would somehow be a financial windfall for Ohioans For Concealed Carry is a magical dream. In Ohio, ORC 9.68 simply refunds your costs. Who gets paid? The lawyers - thats who gets paid, regardless of if we win or not.
I also wonder why OFCC (Jeff), doesn't sponsor more M&G's. Is that another liability issue?
Maybe you missed the post I made a few back where I said it'd be awesome if we could start running M&G's like the Gun Shows. I think when you see the submission form we're working on tonight (it's not live yet) you'll see that we're actually going down that road 100% - I think it'd be a great idea if we could coordinate more of them. The question becomes can we hold M&G's without someone insisting they need to open carry at it and get us booted out of an establishment where we could otherwise have some great socializing? I distinctly recall someone refusing to come to a Cleveland holiday M&G because we asked them not to open carry at the Cracker Barrel during our event.
You are 9000 times more likely to die at a doctor's hand than at the hand of a gun owner. Yes, I have a copy of the stats in my OC folder.
While I don't understand this point being made in this thread, you're also 9000 times less likely to get a business posted if you don't show up at their doors with 5-15 people openly carrying and scaring the bejesus out of the rest of their paying customers. I understand - its activism through educating people that what you're doing is legal, but the net result is another business invokes their private property rights to tell you never to come back again armed, and we all pay the price.
This is why we feel some open carry events might make sense and others on private property are a risk / liability to the cause. You're also probably 9000 times more likely to be successful diplomatically talking to city officials and equally as likely to get stonewalled if you call them up and threaten them with a lawsuit if they don't "stop violating ORC 9.68" -- yet we have people who continue to do this time and time again in some knee jerk reaction to "getting it done" through brute force.
Recently, while working one of these, the city officials asked us "Do you know who XYZ is?" and it became obvious that third parties here on the forums were poking a stick in the eye of city officials.
Oh, and Jeff, the 'no volunteers thing', really old. I wasn't qualified to pick up trash on your stretch of highway. But I volunteered.
I wasn't involved in any of the Highway project at all, so I have no idea what you're referring to other than the fact that we did one. I'm not sure why you were deemed "not qualified" - did you refuse to come without a gun? I believe that was a mandate of ODOT which we agreed to, so if you chose not to, nothing I can do about it.
I do thank you for your effort but if you're going to hold an ODOT rule against us (and I'm really speculating here) that seems unfair.