Support The Forums:

The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation here

Guns drawn on me in a pizza joint

Use this forum to post your experience with encounters with law enforcement, criminals, or other encounters as a result of your firearm or potential to be carrying one.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
rifleman308
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Kettering Ohio
Contact:

Post by rifleman308 »

I was standing in a gun shop when the Officer asked me if he could see my weapon because it was factory engraved. That's when I told him that. I would not do it at a traffic stop but I would tell him I prefer to use the firearm term even though he wants to use the other. If you come in my gun shop you will never hear me call one of my guns called a weapon. Never., Calling all guns weapons is a negative term used by people that don't know any better. My friend came in to my shop on Sunday and he used the weapon term to a customer about 25 times and I asked him not to use the term in the shop any more when speaking to a customer. I had the city council people in on Saturday and one of them said that we liked the idea of a gun shop coming to town but why is the only thing you sell assault weapons? I instantly went off on the idiot. I told him I did not have a single assault weapon in the shop and most where for target practice and varmint guns and not to be used for assaulting someone.
Calling all firearms weapons is like calling all mothers baby killers!!!!!!! :evil:
Firearms Instructor
ODNR Master Instructor
www.ohiogunpermit.com
TunnelRat
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 9710
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:31 am
Location: Toledo

Post by TunnelRat »

rifleman308 wrote:I was standing in a gun shop when the Officer asked me if he could see my weapon because it was factory engraved. That's when I told him that. I would not do it at a traffic stop but I would tell him I prefer to use the firearm term even though he wants to use the other. If you come in my gun shop you will never hear me call one of my guns called a weapon. Never., Calling all guns weapons is a negative term used by people that don't know any better. My friend came in to my shop on Sunday and he used the weapon term to a customer about 25 times and I asked him not to use the term in the shop any more when speaking to a customer. I had the city council people in on Saturday and one of them said that we liked the idea of a gun shop coming to town but why is the only thing you sell assault weapons? I instantly went off on the idiot. I told him I did not have a single assault weapon in the shop and most where for target practice and varmint guns and not to be used for assaulting someone.
Calling all firearms weapons is like calling all mothers baby killers!!!!!!! :evil:
I agree with you on every point you make. I can see that the connotations that attend the term "weapon" can be avoided by a careful, yet simple selection of other, more descriptive terms, such as "rifle," or "pistol," or "handgun". I see your point and I agree with your reasoning. We have a significant firearms vocabulary; we should be wise as to our usage since we have to do with an anti-gun culture.

We can, and perhaps we should, endeavor to use more friendly terms and to emphasize the postive aspects of gunhandling. We might well prefer to avoid calling firearms "weapons" due to that term's negative connotations, but we ought not to overstep. It may well be true that "weapon" has negative connations, but it is equally or even more true that a firearm is indeed a weapon. Perhaps that's why we struggle to use a different terminology -- there's no need to scare off the sheep.

However, I am concerned when you say: "A firearm is not a weapon", and your students learn to repeat that. It is one thing to say a Government Model 1911 is a pistol, or is a handgun.; it is another thing to say it is not a weapon. It is one thing to say that a S&W 686 is a revolver; it is another thing to say it is not a weapon.

Even you agree that you "would not do it at a traffic stop"...

Sorry, I don't mean to nitpick. I very much appreciate your service as an instructor. I just want to be sure we are sending a clear message.
TunnelRat

"Applying the standard that is well established in our case law, we hold that the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States." ~ McDonald v. Chicago

When your only tools are a hammer and sickle, every problem starts to look like too much freedom.
rifleman308
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Kettering Ohio
Contact:

Post by rifleman308 »

I send a very clear message to my CHL students and to my students when I was in the bomb dump as an instructor. Yes that military rifle was a weapon but to call an Olympic target rifle a weapon is just being narrow minded at the least. Calling a tire iron a weapon when it has only been used to change tires is the same thing. A National Match 45 that is only being shot at paper a weapon. NO. I have been an instructor for a very long time and I am a NRA recruiter. "Weapon" is not used and they are my students and no one tells me what to call the firearms except for the NRA. Anything else is not considered. A trafic stop by an Officer and he asks for my weapon so I give up my firearm but I never during the stop call it anything other than what I want. Most Officers are not in the mood for an arguement so I don't get it started.
In the Military I carried a weapon now when I go to the range I shoot a hand gun or a rifle.
Firearms Instructor
ODNR Master Instructor
www.ohiogunpermit.com
GWC
Posts: 4494
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: Lake County 44077

Post by GWC »

I think we should call our guns Fluffy Bunnies.
TunnelRat
Deceased
Deceased
Posts: 9710
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:31 am
Location: Toledo

Post by TunnelRat »

GWC wrote:I think we should call our guns Fluffy Bunnies.
Apparently you are not alone...
TunnelRat

"Applying the standard that is well established in our case law, we hold that the Second Amendment right is fully applicable to the States." ~ McDonald v. Chicago

When your only tools are a hammer and sickle, every problem starts to look like too much freedom.
Jronjakoh
Posts: 2936
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 6:27 pm
Location: Youngstown,Oh
Contact:

Post by Jronjakoh »

I have to agree with Rifleman. I've never had the privelege to be in the armed forces. I was rejected in the 'draft line' because of my hearing. I wanted to go so bad I had enlisted in 4 different branches before I went to the draftline. in 68.
When most documentaries of the armed forces are shown especially 'boot camp' that is all you hear the D.I.'s yell. " YOUR WEAPON"
My daughter was taught that as an Navel Sea cadet D.I.
It is called a weapon. Today she calls it a gun.
That word I think scares the people.public more than anything else.
They hear the word 'gun' and watch them take a double take at the person saying the word.
I try to use a word that will not shake up the sheeple so I use firearm or weapon. But lately the word weapon seems to have the same effect.
So I try to use the word handgun,pistol,semi auto,shotgun or rifle.

Da always had the old saying he was taught:
This is my weapon this is my gun
This is for shooting and this is for fun
Americans need not fear the federal government because they enjoy the advantage of being armed, which you possess over the people of almost every other nation. . James Madison.

What's in Your Wallet?

SEMPER PARATUS
Glockulator
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:29 pm

Post by Glockulator »

i can't believe this thread is still going...
jemc02
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Central Ohio

Post by jemc02 »

...and going....and going...and going.....
rifleman308
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:40 pm
Location: Kettering Ohio
Contact:

Post by rifleman308 »

Finally someone that agrees with common sense. The thread has gone on for a while but it has been a greatly debated issue for a very long time and I am going to quit while I am ahead. Thanks to all of you and I am sorry if I offended anyone. If you ever get by the town of Bellbrook stop by and get an AR built while you wait or just for the bull and free coffee.
Firearms Instructor
ODNR Master Instructor
www.ohiogunpermit.com
Jronjakoh
Posts: 2936
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 6:27 pm
Location: Youngstown,Oh
Contact:

Post by Jronjakoh »

Hey !
Can we help it if the Eveready Bunny got involved in this thread??
Americans need not fear the federal government because they enjoy the advantage of being armed, which you possess over the people of almost every other nation. . James Madison.

What's in Your Wallet?

SEMPER PARATUS
dan_sayers
Posts: 5283
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:15 am
Location: Oregon, OH

Post by dan_sayers »

TunnelRat wrote:
rifleman308 wrote:I was standing in a gun shop when the Officer asked me if he could see my weapon because it was factory engraved. That's when I told him that. I would not do it at a traffic stop but I would tell him I prefer to use the firearm term even though he wants to use the other. If you come in my gun shop you will never hear me call one of my guns called a weapon. Never., Calling all guns weapons is a negative term used by people that don't know any better. My friend came in to my shop on Sunday and he used the weapon term to a customer about 25 times and I asked him not to use the term in the shop any more when speaking to a customer. I had the city council people in on Saturday and one of them said that we liked the idea of a gun shop coming to town but why is the only thing you sell assault weapons? I instantly went off on the idiot. I told him I did not have a single assault weapon in the shop and most where for target practice and varmint guns and not to be used for assaulting someone.
Calling all firearms weapons is like calling all mothers baby killers!!!!!!! :evil:
I agree with you on every point you make. I can see that the connotations that attend the term "weapon" can be avoided by a careful, yet simple selection of other, more descriptive terms, such as "rifle," or "pistol," or "handgun". I see your point and I agree with your reasoning. We have a significant firearms vocabulary; we should be wise as to our usage since we have to do with an anti-gun culture.

We can, and perhaps we should, endeavor to use more friendly terms and to emphasize the postive aspects of gunhandling. We might well prefer to avoid calling firearms "weapons" due to that term's negative connotations, but we ought not to overstep. It may well be true that "weapon" has negative connations, but it is equally or even more true that a firearm is indeed a weapon. Perhaps that's why we struggle to use a different terminology -- there's no need to scare off the sheep.

However, I am concerned when you say: "A firearm is not a weapon", and your students learn to repeat that. It is one thing to say a Government Model 1911 is a pistol, or is a handgun.; it is another thing to say it is not a weapon. It is one thing to say that a S&W 686 is a revolver; it is another thing to say it is not a weapon.

Even you agree that you "would not do it at a traffic stop"...

Sorry, I don't mean to nitpick. I very much appreciate your service as an instructor. I just want to be sure we are sending a clear message.
Okay, fine. For the sake of the community I wish to represent dutifully, I will not say it's NOT a weapon. However, I will continue to not call it one and try to help others understand the impact in doing so.

I have the solution by the way: sidearm. What word better expresses that it is an extension of ourselves? While at the same time denoting that it is in the background? 8)
"Moderation in the defense of liberty is no virtue." - Ann Coulter
"Liberalism is part of a religious disorder that demands a belief that life is controllable." - Ann Coulter
By their fruits ye shall know them.
NavyChief
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
Posts: 11628
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:22 am
Location: Greene County
Contact:

Re: The Police building is next to mine

Post by NavyChief »

rifleman308 wrote:I can't write a letter to the Mayor because the Police building touches mine and I need a good neighbor. That is why I didn't mention the City My gun shop is in.
Ahh, but I can mention it to her myownself (obliquely, of course, so as not to ruffle the wrong feathers) when I'm up next month. Yes, I know her - and a couple of the city council members (I should - one is my mom).
Total repeal of ALL firearms/weapons laws at the local, state and federal levels. Period. Wipe the slate clean.
NavyChief
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
Posts: 11628
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:22 am
Location: Greene County
Contact:

Post by NavyChief »

TunnelRat wrote:When the patrolman asks if you have any weapons, he is not in the mood to play word games.
Back when I was going through some of my Navy LE training, the standard question was, "Do you have anything on your person that could be a danger to my partner or me?" Do you think the answer, "No, but I do have a .357, 6" Cold Steel Voyager and a cannister of OC..." would be considered playing word games?
Total repeal of ALL firearms/weapons laws at the local, state and federal levels. Period. Wipe the slate clean.
dirty larry
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:22 am
Location: AKRON OH

Post by dirty larry »

call them what you will, but be it a hand gun or assault rifle, shotgun, or hunting rifle. they all are (together class) weapons! and if used correctly deadly weapons. THERE IS NO SENCE LIKE COMMONSENCE. i wish the hippies, yuppies, preppies, and all the other ies, would take their political correctness and pack it in there volvo and drive nonstop to never neverland.. thank you and goodday.
''Illegitimis Non Carborundum'' Gen. Josheph Stilwell. ''Es En Das Blut".. Dirty Larry
SMMAssociates
Posts: 9557
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:36 am
Location: Youngstown OH

Post by SMMAssociates »

Chief:

Yup.... :twisted:

But a "Yes, but only if you shoot first" or some such, probably would be OK....

By then they should know you're a CHL and carrying, anyway, if it's a vehicular issue. Otherwise, any LEO who assumes a "contact" isn't armed may be in for a short career.

I don't think I'd wave anything in anybody's face, and it's hard to guess their mood, but there's far less risk in answering the question honestly. We're supposed to be the good guys, too....

Regards,
Stu.

(Why write a quick note when you can write a novel?)

(Why do those who claim to wish to protect me feel that the best way to do that is to disarm me?)

יזכר לא עד פעם
Post Reply