Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:21 am
by OldManTod
First and foremost I take offense to P4G's post, I am a big fan of Acid cigars (wwwaaaahhhhh)...
Anyway, after reading through all of this as it relates to a percieved tiff, I am still failing to be convinced why any of that needs to be aired.
Perhaps it was the years of my folks telling me (and now me telling my children) mind your business, you have enough things to deal with without getting involved in somebody elses.
.02 cents, keep the change..
T
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:46 am
by TunnelRat
ToddHill wrote:Posts for people with nothing better to do.
Ouch!
OldManTod wrote:First and foremost I take offense to P4G's post, I am a big fan of Acid cigars (wwwaaaahhhhh)...
Yup, a little acid never hurt anybody....
OldManTod wrote:Anyway, after reading through all of this as it relates to a percieved tiff, I am still failing to be convinced why any of that needs to be aired.
Perhaps it was the years of my folks telling me (and now me telling my children) mind your business, you have enough things to deal with without getting involved in somebody elses.
Yup, this is where I come in. The responsible parties are adults and can handle this without me sticking my nose in.
The less said the better. Otherwise we just give encouragement to the anti's.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:48 pm
by Aaron
tommcnaughton wrote:
Yup, this is where I come in. The responsible parties are adults and can handle this without me sticking my nose in.
The less said the better. Otherwise we just give encouragement to the anti's.
Agreed.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:36 pm
by toddhill
Aaron wrote:tommcnaughton wrote:
Yup, this is where I come in. The responsible parties are adults and can handle this without me sticking my nose in.
The less said the better. Otherwise we just give encouragement to the anti's.
Agreed.
I paid for a membership and I've donated extra money to the organization. I expect a little more from the administrators than:
In accordance with the rules and regulations of the Ohioans For Concealed Carry forums, our moderators will promptly delete any posts that may interfere with or hamper the negotiations. This includes linking to any organization or individual's websites or email addresses that may advertise or otherwise publicize the existence of an organization making claims to be affiliated with Ohioans For Concealed Carry.
It reminds me of *now I'm taking my toys and going home*
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:47 pm
by Hermangotshisguns
We all have paid our money. I agree with Todd
Re: OFCC Organizational Dispute
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 2:04 pm
by toddhill
Terry Wolf wrote:Folks: It has been almost a month since an opaque mention of a dispute within this organization was posted in this forum.
This subject is being discussed very openly on the national level "Glock Talk" forum.
I respectfully suggest it is well past time the current leadership of OFCC very candidly, openly and honestly inform the membership fully concerning this dispute.
--Terry
It's interesting that it has been 10 days since this thread has started and knowbody from OFCC has chimed in
Oh well, life goes on.
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:44 pm
by BB62
toddhill wrote:In accordance with the rules and regulations of the Ohioans For Concealed Carry forums, our moderators will promptly delete any posts that may interfere with or hamper the negotiations. This includes linking to any organization or individual's websites or email addresses that may advertise or otherwise publicize the existence of an organization making claims to be affiliated with Ohioans For Concealed Carry.
*I* don't know of an organization making claims to be affiliated with OFCC - does anyone else? If so, can someone point me to where this supposed organization has expressed such affiliation(s)?
BB62