Cincinnati Following Columbus' Lead

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
FormerNavy
Posts: 2342
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Southwest Ohio

Cincinnati Following Columbus' Lead

Post by FormerNavy »

Seems Cincinnati has seen the memo from Columbus.... they are preparing to pass some gun laws and apparently have already sued the state last week to have 9.68 declared unconstitutional (thought this had already been decided....)

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/p ... 862186007/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
147Doc
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:31 pm
Location: NE Cincinnati Metro Area

Re: Cincinnati Following Columbus' Lead

Post by 147Doc »

The mayor of Cincinnati, Aftab Pureval, was interviewed briefly on the local news this evening.
He acknowledged that the state laws prohibited cities from passing laws in conflict with the state preemption law, but (sic) "we've gone over these pretty carefully and we're sure they'll pass."

Some of the laws, he said, were to give Cinci PD something with which to charge people. For instance, there's already laws on the books banning people with domestic violence crimes from owning, but those aren't Cincinnati laws.
:roll:
User avatar
FormerNavy
Posts: 2342
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Southwest Ohio

Re: Cincinnati Following Columbus' Lead (UPDATED)

Post by FormerNavy »

Seems Cincinnati won the first round, with a liberal judge...

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2 ... 852273007/

https://www.wlwt.com/article/cincinnati ... g/45142184


Now, I thought preemption had been decided by the OSC... multiple times? The quote that really gets me, "Pureval expressed confidence that ultimately Justice Joe Deters and the Republican majority on the Ohio Supreme Court will come down on the side of local control." :lol: :lol: :lol:

I don't believe for a minute that Deters, or the OSC... is going to reverse their prior decisions on 9.68.
Brian D.
Posts: 16229
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: SW Ohio

Re: Cincinnati Following Columbus' Lead

Post by Brian D. »

As I stated elsewhere today, Ohio Revised Code 9.68 still has no enforcement teeth. Toothless as a meth head from (fill in the blank with your own choice of location). Ohio cities will continue to pull these shenanigans until they can be punished for it.
Quit worrying, hide your gun well, shut up, and CARRY that handgun!

********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
WhyNot
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am
Location: NW Ohio

Re: Cincinnati Following Columbus' Lead

Post by WhyNot »

...and I have provided the potential methodology to stop them within several posts.

For the new members, using ORC 124.34 whereas a public official or employee does something dead wrong or even mildly inappropriate. Then, this is charged by....now, be careful who is the victim and charging filer...ANYONE :lol: including thy neighbor. Charges are submitted to the State Personnel Board of Review and/or Employees Review Board (SERB)...

The anyone form is there also

https://pbr.ohio.gov/home
Acquisitions thus far:

-Slingshot
-Butter knife
-Soda straw and peas
-Sharpened pencil
-Newspaper roll
--water balloon (*diversionary*)

Yeah, I'm that good
Post Reply