The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation here
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
I had some similar stuff back in the late 80's. IIRC it had hard primers and would not reliably ignite in my Glock. Sounds like whatever you are using is working out OK though.
glocksmith wrote:I had some similar stuff back in the late 80's. IIRC it had hard primers and would not reliably ignite in my Glock. Sounds like whatever you are using is working out OK though.
I bought a couple of thousand rounds of it back in the 80's and stopped shooting it but couldn't remember why but now that you mention it I do believe your right about the hard primers. I was thinking it was corrosive as well but another thread says it is not. Time to take it out again and see how it does.
"I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees." Emiliano Zapata
Someone locked your other thread with nearly the same name as this one without actually reading them to see that the photos were different and the ammo is from two different continents.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
AlanM wrote:Someone locked your other thread with nearly the same name as this one without actually reading them to see that the photos were different and the ammo is from two different continents.
It was locked but with that ammo I was more curious if it was corrosive or not. I don't think it is but I just want to see if anyone knew for sure.
"I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees." Emiliano Zapata
AlanM wrote:Someone locked your other thread with nearly the same name as this one without actually reading them to see that the photos were different and the ammo is from two different continents.
It was locked but with that ammo I was more curious if it was corrosive or not. I don't think it is but I just want to see if anyone knew for sure.
Just unlocked the other thread. Thanks Alan for pointing out my mistake.
Don M
U S Army Veteran 84-91
OFCC Patron Member
NRA Life Member
ORPA Member
WVCDL Member
NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor / RSO
glocksmith wrote:I had some similar stuff back in the late 80's. IIRC it had hard primers and would not reliably ignite in my Glock. Sounds like whatever you are using is working out OK though.
I bought a couple of thousand rounds of it back in the 80's and stopped shooting it but couldn't remember why but now that you mention it I do believe your right about the hard primers. I was thinking it was corrosive as well but another thread says it is not. Time to take it out again and see how it does.
IIRC it was Lapua ca. early 1950's. I assume those hard primers were intended for their Suomi open-bolt subguns. IIRC it was non-corrosive - which was uncommon for milsurp stuff of that vintage - and it caused a bit of a stir when large quantities showed up on the market in the late 1980's. Everyone was buying it for their autopistols and wondering why they were having so much trouble shooting it.
buckeyered wrote:Can hard primers damage a firing pin? I hate letting the ammo sit any longer.
I COULD be wrong (it wouldn't be the first time) but I don't think "hard primers" are physically harder per se, but rather are harder (more difficult) to get to detonate.
One of the most persistent myths in shooting is that there are hard primers and soft primers. That isn't true. The real issue is primer sensitivity or - more frequently - something within the gun or loading process that causes the gun to go click when it shoulda' gone bang.
EDIT #2:
And yet when I Google "hard primer ammo for machine guns" I get quite a few hits.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
buckeyered wrote:Can hard primers damage a firing pin? I hate letting the ammo sit any longer.
I COULD be wrong (it wouldn't be the first time) but I don't think "hard primers" are physically harder per se, but rather are harder (more difficult) to get to detonate.
One of the most persistent myths in shooting is that there are hard primers and soft primers. That isn't true. The real issue is primer sensitivity or - more frequently - something within the gun or loading process that causes the gun to go click when it shoulda' gone bang.
EDIT #2:
And yet when I Google "hard primer ammo for machine guns" I get quite a few hits.
"I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees." Emiliano Zapata