JustaShooter wrote:Imcrazy wrote:I've never even given it a thought that the gun might go off by racking a round into it, how would that even be possible? Hammer falling past the safety catch on a series 70 1911 maybe?.... I guess I can see the example of a defective gun causing a ND/AD like the XDS did at one point so I will say yeah point it at something that will absorb the shot and you won't be devastated if it's destroyed...
Neither had I until the recall, to be honest. But since I had an XDs and was now aware that simply chambering a round could result in a discharge, it got me to thinking, and I decided that my concept of "safe direction" needed to be reevaluated.
I don't disagree with your line of thinking, at all,
Imcrazy.
However, there's always that - however remote - chance of *something* going awry.
A firearm under recall is definitely such a possibility, but we all should remember what initiated the recall in the first place: that there were instances of mechanical fault that were
then unknown.
Additionally, the possibility - again however remote - of parts failure that causes such a problem just cannot be erased.
I know that this is taking things to the extremes, and I am by no way suggesting that this is reasonable, but to-wit, if we are so certain of the condition of our weapon, then can we not discard Rules 2 and 3 (and 4, too, but that's almost inconsequential as a result of the 2/3 violation), at-will?
I guess what I'm trying to suggest is that there is value-added to having that backstop - or, at the very least, being conscious of where that bullet might go and the damage that it can potentially do, should that happen.
