Calling all firearms weapons is like calling all mothers baby killers!!!!!!!

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators
I agree with you on every point you make. I can see that the connotations that attend the term "weapon" can be avoided by a careful, yet simple selection of other, more descriptive terms, such as "rifle," or "pistol," or "handgun". I see your point and I agree with your reasoning. We have a significant firearms vocabulary; we should be wise as to our usage since we have to do with an anti-gun culture.rifleman308 wrote:I was standing in a gun shop when the Officer asked me if he could see my weapon because it was factory engraved. That's when I told him that. I would not do it at a traffic stop but I would tell him I prefer to use the firearm term even though he wants to use the other. If you come in my gun shop you will never hear me call one of my guns called a weapon. Never., Calling all guns weapons is a negative term used by people that don't know any better. My friend came in to my shop on Sunday and he used the weapon term to a customer about 25 times and I asked him not to use the term in the shop any more when speaking to a customer. I had the city council people in on Saturday and one of them said that we liked the idea of a gun shop coming to town but why is the only thing you sell assault weapons? I instantly went off on the idiot. I told him I did not have a single assault weapon in the shop and most where for target practice and varmint guns and not to be used for assaulting someone.
Calling all firearms weapons is like calling all mothers baby killers!!!!!!!
Apparently you are not alone...GWC wrote:I think we should call our guns Fluffy Bunnies.
Okay, fine. For the sake of the community I wish to represent dutifully, I will not say it's NOT a weapon. However, I will continue to not call it one and try to help others understand the impact in doing so.TunnelRat wrote:I agree with you on every point you make. I can see that the connotations that attend the term "weapon" can be avoided by a careful, yet simple selection of other, more descriptive terms, such as "rifle," or "pistol," or "handgun". I see your point and I agree with your reasoning. We have a significant firearms vocabulary; we should be wise as to our usage since we have to do with an anti-gun culture.rifleman308 wrote:I was standing in a gun shop when the Officer asked me if he could see my weapon because it was factory engraved. That's when I told him that. I would not do it at a traffic stop but I would tell him I prefer to use the firearm term even though he wants to use the other. If you come in my gun shop you will never hear me call one of my guns called a weapon. Never., Calling all guns weapons is a negative term used by people that don't know any better. My friend came in to my shop on Sunday and he used the weapon term to a customer about 25 times and I asked him not to use the term in the shop any more when speaking to a customer. I had the city council people in on Saturday and one of them said that we liked the idea of a gun shop coming to town but why is the only thing you sell assault weapons? I instantly went off on the idiot. I told him I did not have a single assault weapon in the shop and most where for target practice and varmint guns and not to be used for assaulting someone.
Calling all firearms weapons is like calling all mothers baby killers!!!!!!!
We can, and perhaps we should, endeavor to use more friendly terms and to emphasize the postive aspects of gunhandling. We might well prefer to avoid calling firearms "weapons" due to that term's negative connotations, but we ought not to overstep. It may well be true that "weapon" has negative connations, but it is equally or even more true that a firearm is indeed a weapon. Perhaps that's why we struggle to use a different terminology -- there's no need to scare off the sheep.
However, I am concerned when you say: "A firearm is not a weapon", and your students learn to repeat that. It is one thing to say a Government Model 1911 is a pistol, or is a handgun.; it is another thing to say it is not a weapon. It is one thing to say that a S&W 686 is a revolver; it is another thing to say it is not a weapon.
Even you agree that you "would not do it at a traffic stop"...
Sorry, I don't mean to nitpick. I very much appreciate your service as an instructor. I just want to be sure we are sending a clear message.
Ahh, but I can mention it to her myownself (obliquely, of course, so as not to ruffle the wrong feathers) when I'm up next month. Yes, I know her - and a couple of the city council members (I should - one is my mom).rifleman308 wrote:I can't write a letter to the Mayor because the Police building touches mine and I need a good neighbor. That is why I didn't mention the City My gun shop is in.
Back when I was going through some of my Navy LE training, the standard question was, "Do you have anything on your person that could be a danger to my partner or me?" Do you think the answer, "No, but I do have a .357, 6" Cold Steel Voyager and a cannister of OC..." would be considered playing word games?TunnelRat wrote:When the patrolman asks if you have any weapons, he is not in the mood to play word games.