Support The Forums:
The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation hereSnubby.500 S&W revolver
Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators
- Morne
- OFCC Coordinator
- Posts: 10631
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:01 pm
- Location: Wayne County
Snubby.500 S&W revolver
...and it is a Taurus no less!
my wrist aches
The Taurus revolver fanboy in me craves it. Practicality, sanity and my future ability to use my wrists all scream no.
Discuss.
my wrist aches
The Taurus revolver fanboy in me craves it. Practicality, sanity and my future ability to use my wrists all scream no.
Discuss.
Thus spoke Zarathustra.
Footsoldier in the Conservative Insurrection of the GOP.
Remember, only you can prevent big government!
Footsoldier in the Conservative Insurrection of the GOP.
Remember, only you can prevent big government!
- BobK
- Posts: 15602
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:26 pm
- Location: Houston TX (formerly Franklin County)
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
I went to a S&W event at the LGS, where I got to shoot 6 different S&W models. They provided 6 rounds of ammo for each of the models.
One of the models was the S&W .500 with a 6" barrel. Big heavy gun, not a snubby.
I lasted 3 shots and turned in 3 unused rounds. That was enough for me. The first shot create a good sized blood blister on the inside of my thumb near the palm.
To put this in perspective, I will shoot a couple of hundred rounds per range session with my .44 mag without any issues or distress, so I am not exactly recoil sensitive and I know how to grip a revolver. My .44 mag handloads are throwing .255 gr cast bullets at 1550 fps so these are not light loads (in fact, they are probably slightly over max).
Those 3 shots of .500 satisfied my itch. I have no desire for shooting one again.
One of the models was the S&W .500 with a 6" barrel. Big heavy gun, not a snubby.
I lasted 3 shots and turned in 3 unused rounds. That was enough for me. The first shot create a good sized blood blister on the inside of my thumb near the palm.

To put this in perspective, I will shoot a couple of hundred rounds per range session with my .44 mag without any issues or distress, so I am not exactly recoil sensitive and I know how to grip a revolver. My .44 mag handloads are throwing .255 gr cast bullets at 1550 fps so these are not light loads (in fact, they are probably slightly over max).
Those 3 shots of .500 satisfied my itch. I have no desire for shooting one again.
I am a: NRA Life Member, Texas State Rifle Association Life Member, Texas Firearms Coalition Gold member, OFCC Patron Member, former JFPO member (pre-SAF).
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
More Obamination. Idiots. Can't we find an electable (R) for 2016?
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
More Obamination. Idiots. Can't we find an electable (R) for 2016?
-
- OFCC Coordinator
- Posts: 3549
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:26 pm
- Location: n.e. ohio
- Contact:
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Go for it, everyone needs to own at least one impractical gun that they won't use much. I don't shoot my 50 bmg much but i'am happy to own one.Morne wrote:...and it is a Taurus no less!
my wrist aches
The Taurus revolver fanboy in me craves it. Practicality, sanity and my future ability to use my wrists all scream no.
Discuss.


Black Rifles Matter
-
- Posts: 16483
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:42 pm
- Location: SW Ohio
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Clicking the link made my wallet ache, Morne, just seeing an $850 price tag on ANY Taurus product. (Yeah I know how the site works, the figure up top isn't what will be paid.)
Bobk I've mentioned this before but when S&W brought out both the .500 revolver and the Scandium framed Model 29 .44 magnum, I ran into my buddy Jerry Miculek at the SHOT Show and asked how tough they were to shoot. He said the "shock absorbing" stocks on the X-frame guns helped a good bit with recoil but that the 4" Model 329 was purely "brutal" to fire.
Yeah, took me a couple months to try those products out and find that Jerry was spot-on.
Bobk I've mentioned this before but when S&W brought out both the .500 revolver and the Scandium framed Model 29 .44 magnum, I ran into my buddy Jerry Miculek at the SHOT Show and asked how tough they were to shoot. He said the "shock absorbing" stocks on the X-frame guns helped a good bit with recoil but that the 4" Model 329 was purely "brutal" to fire.
Yeah, took me a couple months to try those products out and find that Jerry was spot-on.
Quit worrying, hide your gun well, shut up, and CARRY that handgun!
********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
- Curzyk
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:52 am
- Location: Franklin County, Ohio
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
I rented the 8" or 10" S&W 500, whichever Black Wing has. ONE shot was enough for me. I could barely hold the revolver up on target, especially since I was bracing for the massive recoil. I found it so unpleasant to shoot, but my little brother loved it and shot it 9 times.BobK wrote:I lasted 3 shots and turned in 3 unused rounds. That was enough for me. The first shot create a good sized blood blister on the inside of my thumb near the palm.![]()
...
Those 3 shots of .500 satisfied my itch. I have no desire for shooting one again.
- Mr. Glock
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:20 pm
- Location: NE Ohio
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
That may be one of those things you just need to own....
OFCC Patron, GOA, SAF, YouTube 2A Patreon, NRA Benefactor Life & Hot Stove League Member
- Sevens
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 7531
- Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 8:30 am
- Location: Far East Side of CBus
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Bunch of thoughts in no particular order.
I have an 8-3/8" .460XVR and had the same revolver in .500 Mag also. Sold the .500 because it only made sense to keep one and I chose the .460.
I find the X-frames, their porting, weight and advanced grip to be a pleasure to shoot. Loads from a single shot Katahdin .500 barrel on a T/C Encore rifle and .460 from a 14" Encore handgun were both horrendously brutal, awful and painful. I sent 5rds of .500 through that single shot rifle just to prove that I could/would. Worst recoil I've ever felt. The Encore handgun was torture also. But the S&W X-frame revolvers I actually enjoy!
Keep in mind that we're talking factory Hornady and handloads mimicking that ammo. There are some heavyweight boutique cast lead loads that likely go well beyond. But bottom line for me is that just about -ANY- .44 Mag, to me, is awful and I much prefer these X-frames.
Especially a Ruger Blackhawk .44 Magnum... awful. My one .44 Mag is a 7.5" Redhawk and I had a Mag-Na-Port four-port job done to it to tame it. Bobk's 255gr at over 1,500fps sounds evil and hateful. For sure, I would MUCH rather send a jacketed 240gr XTP out of my X-frame at 1,800+. To me -- just far more enjoyable.
To the subject Taurus:
No way. I have no intention of inciting a brand war, but I would expect both the S&W and the Taurus to surrender to abuse at some point. The difference is in the companies that back them. Seems to me that any .500 Mag revolver will NEED factory service if it gets shot a lot. Taurus is one outfit that NOBODY wants to deal with. They have proven countless times that customer service is a black hole.
I have an 8-3/8" .460XVR and had the same revolver in .500 Mag also. Sold the .500 because it only made sense to keep one and I chose the .460.
I find the X-frames, their porting, weight and advanced grip to be a pleasure to shoot. Loads from a single shot Katahdin .500 barrel on a T/C Encore rifle and .460 from a 14" Encore handgun were both horrendously brutal, awful and painful. I sent 5rds of .500 through that single shot rifle just to prove that I could/would. Worst recoil I've ever felt. The Encore handgun was torture also. But the S&W X-frame revolvers I actually enjoy!
Keep in mind that we're talking factory Hornady and handloads mimicking that ammo. There are some heavyweight boutique cast lead loads that likely go well beyond. But bottom line for me is that just about -ANY- .44 Mag, to me, is awful and I much prefer these X-frames.
Especially a Ruger Blackhawk .44 Magnum... awful. My one .44 Mag is a 7.5" Redhawk and I had a Mag-Na-Port four-port job done to it to tame it. Bobk's 255gr at over 1,500fps sounds evil and hateful. For sure, I would MUCH rather send a jacketed 240gr XTP out of my X-frame at 1,800+. To me -- just far more enjoyable.
To the subject Taurus:
No way. I have no intention of inciting a brand war, but I would expect both the S&W and the Taurus to surrender to abuse at some point. The difference is in the companies that back them. Seems to me that any .500 Mag revolver will NEED factory service if it gets shot a lot. Taurus is one outfit that NOBODY wants to deal with. They have proven countless times that customer service is a black hole.
I like to swap brass... and I'm looking for .32 H&R Mag, .327 Fed Mag, .380 Auto and 10mm. If you have some and would like to swap for something else, send me a note!
- yogidave
- Posts: 1929
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:23 am
- Location: maumee
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
I have shot a 500 and while it was fun, it does leave a bit of a sting.steves 50de wrote:Go for it, everyone needs to own at least one impractical gun that they won't use much. I don't shoot my 50 bmg much but i'am happy to own one.Morne wrote:...and it is a Taurus no less!
my wrist aches
The Taurus revolver fanboy in me craves it. Practicality, sanity and my future ability to use my wrists all scream no.
Discuss.![]()


-
- Posts: 3918
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 10:04 am
- Location: Cincinnati/SW Ohio
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
I agree with Sevens. They're not all that bad. In the .500, if you use sensible handloads, they're no more punishing than say a lighter framed .44mag, or even the small J and K frames firing .38+P/.357mag. The problem with many people's first experiences with the .500 is that some joker usually gives them the heavyweight Buffalo Bore or CorBon "Bear loads" to fire - which is enough to turn just about anyone off. Using 350 grain XTP's with a 30 grain charge of 2400, or an 18 grain charge of Unique...gives plenty of power without being obnoxious. Also, it is a cartridge which you simply don't try to run through a 100 round session at the range - it was designed as a big bore hunting gun, and not an all-day plinker. At $2 or $3 bucks a pop, that should be obviousSevens wrote:I find the X-frames, their porting, weight and advanced grip to be a pleasure to shoot.

Give em' Hell Pike!!!
- Mr. Glock
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 8965
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:20 pm
- Location: NE Ohio
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Recoil is a funny thing. Differs from gun to gun, and person to person.
I just want to see Morne CC that rig.
I just want to see Morne CC that rig.
OFCC Patron, GOA, SAF, YouTube 2A Patreon, NRA Benefactor Life & Hot Stove League Member
- Morne
- OFCC Coordinator
- Posts: 10631
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:01 pm
- Location: Wayne County
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Mr. Glock wrote:Recoil is a funny thing. Differs from gun to gun, and person to person.
I just want to see Morne CC that rig.

Thus spoke Zarathustra.
Footsoldier in the Conservative Insurrection of the GOP.
Remember, only you can prevent big government!
Footsoldier in the Conservative Insurrection of the GOP.
Remember, only you can prevent big government!
- djthomas
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:09 am
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Bah... Do a Form 1 on it and then come up with a shoulder stock rig!
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:30 am
- Location: Loveland, OH
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
My dealer said the S&W 500 was a.ridiculous gun. I told him it was wonderfully ridiculous. Why did I get it? Because I can.
- Bruenor
- Posts: 7306
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:03 pm
- Location: Geneva, OH
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
Shot one at the LGS a few years back, two rounds was enough. I can say I did it, and I'm cured of wanting to buy one.
If I were going to get a pistol of that type I would go for the .460 to have more options on ammo selections..
.460 -> .454 casull -> .45 Colt
.460 if I ever found myself in Brown bear country, and .45 colt for plinking at the range.
If I were going to get a pistol of that type I would go for the .460 to have more options on ammo selections..
.460 -> .454 casull -> .45 Colt
.460 if I ever found myself in Brown bear country, and .45 colt for plinking at the range.
Μολὼν λαβέ
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
- Thomas Paine
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."
- Thomas Jefferson
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."
- Thomas Paine
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."
- Thomas Jefferson
-
- OFCC Member
- Posts: 7485
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:53 pm
- Location: Sandusky County
Re: Snubby.500 S&W revolver
.50 Caliber handgun. For when there's a burglar hiding behind the refrigerator. Of your neighbor's house.
A Taurus .480 Ruger revolver is my useless, but fun handgun along with a 7.62 Tokarov pistol to set a BG's clothes on fire.

A Taurus .480 Ruger revolver is my useless, but fun handgun along with a 7.62 Tokarov pistol to set a BG's clothes on fire.
Famous last words: "I just drank What?!-Socrates
bruh bruh is slang for "complete and total moron" -sodbuster95
The following is a list of children's books that didn't quite make it to the printing press...
1. What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?
2. Daddy Drinks Because You Cry
3. You Were An Accident
4. Bi-Curious George
bruh bruh is slang for "complete and total moron" -sodbuster95
The following is a list of children's books that didn't quite make it to the printing press...
1. What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?
2. Daddy Drinks Because You Cry
3. You Were An Accident
4. Bi-Curious George