Support The Forums:

The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation here

HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
pleasantguywhopacks
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 16747
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Whitehouse, OH

HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by pleasantguywhopacks »

What, no love for this passing the house?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOxXpNBdrVE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!
Life Member NRA
Tweed Ring
Posts: 17812
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by Tweed Ring »

I'm not a hunter, and I was disappointed with the suppressed handgun I saw a few years ago. Having said that, I am pleased with any enhanced gun rights for Ohioans.

I was at my state rep's fund raiser this evening, and I thanked her for voting for this proposal.
curmudgeon3
Posts: 6534
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:31 pm

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by curmudgeon3 »

That one shouldn't get much opposition from either side of the aisle in the Legislature, or the Governor's office.
Mindbender14
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: Hancock County

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by Mindbender14 »

Tweed Ring wrote:I'm not a hunter, and I was disappointed with the suppressed handgun I saw a few years ago. Having said that, I am pleased with any enhanced gun rights for Ohioans.

I was at my state rep's fund raiser this evening, and I thanked her for voting for this proposal.
What handgun did you see suppressed? And what suppressor?
Brian D.
Posts: 16483
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: SW Ohio

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by Brian D. »

Lately I have as much dread as optimism when the news reports that "The bill will now go to the Ohio Senate for consideration." Things move way too slowly there.
Quit worrying, hide your gun well, shut up, and CARRY that handgun!

********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
Tweed Ring
Posts: 17812
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by Tweed Ring »

Mindbender14 wrote:
Tweed Ring wrote:I'm not a hunter, and I was disappointed with the suppressed handgun I saw a few years ago. Having said that, I am pleased with any enhanced gun rights for Ohioans.

I was at my state rep's fund raiser this evening, and I thanked her for voting for this proposal.
What handgun did you see suppressed? And what suppressor?
Another instructor and I were training a CHL class. It as a 9 mm Sig, if memory serves, and the other instructor had just received the suppressor he had ordered. We were at the smaller indoor range at Black Wing. Even with ear protection, the report was quite loud, to me.

The only thing I previously knew about suppressors was what I had viewed from TV & movies, specifically certain scenes in "Casino" and "Goodfellas" and a few comments from some hard guys at the grey bar hotel.

There was a presentation on suppressors for members of the OGA earlier this year at Black Wing done by BFA and others.

Like I said, I really don't have a dog in this fight, but I am pleased to support any enhancement of gun rights for Ohioans.
User avatar
gaptrick
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 1375
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:02 pm
Location: Cuyahoga/Lake Counties

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by gaptrick »

I don't hunt, nor have I ever personally seen or fondled a suppressor before, so I'm no expert by any means, but I have heard the story told that a suppressor does nothing more than remove that sharp, stinging bite of the report and that I too would be disappointed in finding out the real life fact is that it's nothing like the movies... Oh well... Still a great advancement for the hunters.
Unarmed people are vulnerable people, and criminal predators prey upon them.

AWRHawkin


"A story about a bird stealing a knife from a crime scene...and we're more interested in hearing about the Canadian with a gun.
Man, we need to get lives."
MWSY
User avatar
FlyinCedar
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Kenton, OH

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by FlyinCedar »

Suppressors do not sound like the movies, except probably a .22 can on the right gun. I have a Cricket that I suppressed, which is ridiculously quiet. On an indoor range, you aren't gonna get the full effect of what it can do, as the sound it does make is gonna be magnified by being indoors. Even on a little 22 can, its much louder indoors than out.

I was testing a 308 can the other day, and while obviously not as quiet as tv (with my subsonic loads is quieter than tv would have you believe), I was very impressed by the noise reduction compared to other 308 cans I have used in the past.
John 447
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:20 pm
Location: Sullivan, OH 44880

Re: HB234 Supressors for hunting passed the house

Post by John 447 »

I think the bill was poorly written as I interpret it in that the hunter has to been the person holding the tax stamp. But getting it passed allows for positive changes down the road. The real benefit of suppressed firearms as I see it is with the apprentice hunter. I just don’t see the new hunter shelling out the $$$ to suppress their first hunting rifle.
Post Reply