Support The Forums:

The forums have been hosted for some time now out of my pocket. We are coming up on the annual domain renewal for ohioccwforums.org and I pay roughly $20/month to keep the forums online. I do this to maintain the long-standing history of discussions here indexed in Google, and so that people have a place to discuss this topic outside of modern social media censorship. If you enjoy the forums and you'd like to help offset the cost, please consider a venmo donation here

38 Spcl vs 357 Mag

This section is dedicated to all issues relating to training and tactics. Commercial advertisements and solicitation for your own classes are not
permitted.

Moderators: Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

User avatar
Mr. Glock
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 8965
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:20 pm
Location: NE Ohio

Re: 38 Spcl vs 357 Mag

Post by Mr. Glock »

To give you some real world chrono data out of the same gun on the same day (remember, energy is exponential with speed):

6" Barrel:
Remington 130 gr 38 Spl Metal Case: 841 fps
Speer Gold Dot 125 gr 357M: 1259 fps

4" Barrel
Remington 130 gr 38 Spl Metal Case: 833 fps
Speer Gold Dot 125 gr 357M: 1162 fps

If you want to know why I like (and pay extra for) Buffalo Bore Ammo:
Buffalo Bore 158 gr 357M: 6": 1559 4" 1523


Another Day:

6" Barrel:
Speer Gold Dot 135gr 38 Spl +P: 1018

2.75" Barrel:
Speer Gold Dot 135gr 38 Spl +P: 953


And, again Buffalo Bore, this time a 158 gr LSWC 38 Spl Heavy +P
6"= 1154
2.75"= 1033

The Speer Gold Dot 357 Magnum 158gr was 1029 out of the same 2.75" gun on the same day, while the previously mentioned Buffalo Bore 158 gr 357 Magnum (which is a Gold Dot bullet) was 1309 in the 2.75"
OFCC Patron, GOA, SAF, YouTube 2A Patreon, NRA Benefactor Life & Hot Stove League Member
User avatar
OhioPaints
Posts: 5671
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 4:22 pm
Location: Brown Co./ southern Ohio

Re: 38 Spcl vs 357 Mag

Post by OhioPaints »

Morne wrote:
Sure, a .38 special can show great expansion, looks great in magazine advertising, but it won't penetrate deep enough. That's where the.357 shines, it can penetrate AND expand.

According to the FBI Quantico study on Wounding Ballistics, penetration is a critical issue. You can't incapacitate a bad guy with shallow penetration, no matter how pretty the bullet expands.

Ken
I understand and agree with everything you said EXCEPT for that.

There are several factors that determine penetration and velocity is only one of them. Cross-sectional density is another and is very critical. That's why for a given caliber the heavier rounds, even if they have less kinetic energy, tend to be the better penetrators. I agree that some of the old 110-gr HP loads in .38 Special might very well not make it. But the modern 125-gr and heavier loads are no slouches. The heavier the better.

And yes, I carry .357 Magnum, in 158-gr JHP flavor, but usually only in the summer. For winter carry I still like the trusty old .45 ACP.
Morne,

That's my point: if a bullet expands 1) it takes energy to deform the metal and 2) an expanded bullet has more drag and slows down more quickly. Both of those reduce penetration.

IMO, Only when you have plenty of penetration should you be willing to trade energy for expansion.

Ken
Post Reply