Redefining terms to nullify 2A

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
bignflnut
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
Contact:

Redefining terms to nullify 2A

Post by bignflnut »

Resident Biden and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco will formally unveil new federal regulations targeting 80% lower kits, otherwise known as "ghost guns," in the Rose Garden at 2:15 PM.

Under the new rules, 80% lower kits must be produced by licensed gun manufacturers and include serial numbers, which means background checks will be needed.

The rule will update the regulatory definitions of "frame" and "receiver."

Not everyone is thrilled about Biden's new rules. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY.) tweeted Sunday night:

"The Constitution does not authorize the federal government to prevent you from making your own firearm. This a fact that has been recognized for 200+ years. Also, Article 1, Section 1 (literally the first operative sentence in the Constitution) says Congress makes law, not POTUS!"

Biden is also expected to announce that Steve Dettelbach, a former federal attorney for the Northern District of Ohio, will be his nominee to head the ATF.
If a piece of plastic is now a machine gun, then who doesn't get to rewrite the rules?
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908

Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.

"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Sasquatch.45
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:05 pm
Location: Bellevue Ohio

Re: Redefining terms to nullify 2A

Post by Sasquatch.45 »

If they outlaw 80% lowers... we need to leave another little "Bump" some :twisted: place to be filed off, and "Rebrand" them as 79% lowers... the technicality game works both ways... :twisted:
No law of prohibition ever prevented a crime of violence, They simply provide a framework for punishment for those who fail to commit suicide after going postal.

The devil never made me do anything…However, he did have a couple of really cool ideals…
User avatar
JustaShooter
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
Posts: 5800
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:08 pm
Location: Akron/Canton Area

Re: Redefining terms to nullify 2A

Post by JustaShooter »

Sasquatch.45 wrote:If they outlaw 80% lowers... we need to leave another little "Bump" some :twisted: place to be filed off, and "Rebrand" them as 79% lowers... the technicality game works both ways... :twisted:
The way I read the new rules, that won't work. My interpretation is anything more refined than a 20% aka raw forging will be classified as a firearm frame or receiver and thus required to be serialized and handled through an FFL. Time will tell of course, but that's how I see it at the moment.
Christian, Husband, Father
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Pistol & Rifle Instructor

Want to become more active with OFCC and help fight for your rights? Click Here!
Post Reply