OK goes Constitutional Carry (with half notification?)

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
bignflnut
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
Contact:

OK goes Constitutional Carry (with half notification?)

Post by bignflnut »

Also of particular interest for police officers is a change that says individuals are no longer responsible for notifying a law enforcement officer that they are in possession of a firearm. The onus now is on the officer to ask.

Jeanne Pierce, public information officer with Tulsa Police Department, said people can expect the question about firearms now as matter of course.

“It will probably become something that we will start making a regular practice. When you stop someone, a vehicle stop, you are asked for an ID and also asked if you have a firearm,” she said.

SNIP

Law-abiding citizens should have no issues if they cooperate with law enforcement officials, Regalado said.

“At the end of the day for officers, deputies and law enforcement as a whole, hands are the most dangerous things that we have to be aware of,” he said. “If they’re in plain view with nothing in them, things are really good. If hands are moving in different directions and we can’t see them, and people aren’t listening to our directions, then that raises the concern for us and puts everybody on edge.”
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908

Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.

"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Post Reply