J. Stevens: "Heller was wrongly decided"

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
docachna
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:26 am
Location: Mount Juliet TN

J. Stevens: "Heller was wrongly decided"

Post by docachna »

Justice John Paul Stevens just can't seem to let up for a second.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... ket-newtab
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
User avatar
sodbuster95
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 6954
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:14 pm
Location: Maumee
Contact:

Re: J. Stevens: "Heller was wrongly decided"

Post by sodbuster95 »

Same old, tired argument that only works if you subscribe to the nonsensical theory that the government needed to secure a right to the government against infringement by the government.
NRA Benefactor Life Member

Information posted in these forums is my personal opinion only. It is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
M-Quigley
Posts: 4796
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: J. Stevens: "Heller was wrongly decided"

Post by M-Quigley »

Colonial history contains many examples of firearm regulations in urban areas that imposed obstacles to their use for protection of the home. Boston, Philadelphia, and New York—the three largest cities in America at that time—all imposed restrictions on the firing of guns in the city limits. Boston enacted a law in 1746 prohibiting the “discharge” of any gun or pistol that was later revived in 1778; Philadelphia prohibited firing a gun or setting off fireworks without a governor’s special license; and New York banned the firing of guns for three days surrounding New Year’s Day. Those and other cities also regulated the storage of gunpowder. Boston’s gunpowder law imposed a 10-pound fine on any person who took any loaded firearm into any dwelling house or barn within the town. Most, if not all, of those regulations would violate the Second Amendment as it was construed in the 5–4 decision that Justice Antonin Scalia announced in Heller on June 26, 2008.
You don't have to be a lawyer to see that most of his examples was a restriction on how a gun is used, not the right to own or carry a firearm.

As far as him thinking SCOTUS got it wrong, when has a justice who was in the minority on a decision ever thought SCOTUS got it right on anything?
User avatar
schmieg
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
Posts: 5757
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:11 pm
Location: Madeira, Ohio

Re: J. Stevens: "Heller was wrongly decided"

Post by schmieg »

M-Quigley wrote:
Colonial history contains many examples of firearm regulations in urban areas that imposed obstacles to their use for protection of the home. Boston, Philadelphia, and New York—the three largest cities in America at that time—all imposed restrictions on the firing of guns in the city limits. Boston enacted a law in 1746 prohibiting the “discharge” of any gun or pistol that was later revived in 1778; Philadelphia prohibited firing a gun or setting off fireworks without a governor’s special license; and New York banned the firing of guns for three days surrounding New Year’s Day. Those and other cities also regulated the storage of gunpowder. Boston’s gunpowder law imposed a 10-pound fine on any person who took any loaded firearm into any dwelling house or barn within the town. Most, if not all, of those regulations would violate the Second Amendment as it was construed in the 5–4 decision that Justice Antonin Scalia announced in Heller on June 26, 2008.
You don't have to be a lawyer to see that most of his examples was a restriction on how a gun is used, not the right to own or carry a firearm.

As far as him thinking SCOTUS got it wrong, when has a justice who was in the minority on a decision ever thought SCOTUS got it right on anything?
My memory isn't quite what it used to be and I can't remember the case or the Justice who wrote the majority opinion, but he started out with "Reasonable minds cannot differ ..." It was a 5-4 decision. He really stuck it in on that one.
-- Mike

"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." - Ayn Rand
Post Reply