Exercising his rights...though I'm certain it will be "deceptively edited" or something to excuse these crimes.
Happy 4th of July.
Conneticut RKBA and a pedestrian stop
Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8135
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
- Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
- Contact:
Conneticut RKBA and a pedestrian stop
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
-
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 1253
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:16 pm
- Location: Central Ohio
Re: Conneticut RKBA and a pedestrian stop
A funny example of why the cops should not take something from you when they are not familiar with how to operate it.
-
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:26 am
- Location: Mount Juliet TN
-
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:26 am
- Location: Mount Juliet TN
Re: Conneticut RKBA and a pedestrian stop
Well, apparently the troopers may be right.
I doubt the "public's right to know" would trump the statute, unless there is a specific exception for recording LEO's, which I did not locate. There is (of course) an exception in 570-A-II:
https://www.nhpublaw.org/nh.law.about/law/102#topNew Hampshire law is stricter than federal and many other states' laws. New Hampshire is a "two-party" or "all-party" state where every party to a conversation has to agree to the recording. The New Hampshire statute is RSA 570-A, Wiretapping and Eavesdropping. Intentional violations of RSA 570-A can result in a class B felony or a misdemeanor, as well as money damages.
I doubt the "public's right to know" would trump the statute, unless there is a specific exception for recording LEO's, which I did not locate. There is (of course) an exception in 570-A-II:
(j) A uniformed law enforcement officer to make an audio recording in conjunction with a video recording of a routine stop performed in the ordinary course of patrol duties on any way as defined by RSA 259:125, provided that the officer shall first give notification of such recording to the party to the communication.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE
-
- OFCC Member
- Posts: 7481
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:53 pm
- Location: Sandusky County
Re: Conneticut RKBA and a pedestrian stop
It looked like the troopers made the recording themselves so I guess that makes them party to the conversation.
Famous last words: "I just drank What?!-Socrates
bruh bruh is slang for "complete and total moron" -sodbuster95
The following is a list of children's books that didn't quite make it to the printing press...
1. What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?
2. Daddy Drinks Because You Cry
3. You Were An Accident
4. Bi-Curious George
bruh bruh is slang for "complete and total moron" -sodbuster95
The following is a list of children's books that didn't quite make it to the printing press...
1. What Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?
2. Daddy Drinks Because You Cry
3. You Were An Accident
4. Bi-Curious George
- djthomas
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:09 am
Re: Conneticut RKBA and a pedestrian stop
The incident occurred in Connecticut, not New Hampshire. Regardless this is an area of law where simply reading the statute is not enough. There is a fairly substantial court history originating from many of these so-called "two party" states that have said state law notwithstanding, the public has a constitutional right to record public officials carrying out their duties in a public place so long as the individual doing the recording is not meaningfully interfering with those public officials. At the core, it's a protected first amendment activity. I'm not aware of any court agreeing that the inside of a police cruiser out in public is not also a public place.
Cities are paying out when they screw this up, and pointing to restrictive state laws has been no defense.
Cities are paying out when they screw this up, and pointing to restrictive state laws has been no defense.