Liberal Gun Club - Looting/rioting is valid - don't shoot

[Bruenor]

https://theliberalgunclub.com/looting-and-rioting/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Liberal Gun Club does not and will not equate the value of property with the value of human life. We believe those who are and continue to be oppressed do not need to be told by mostly straight, white folks how to protest or how to grieve.

We firmly believe shooting people to protect property is wrong, regardless of if its your television or the corner drug store at risk.

We firmly believe shooting people because they are protesting is wrong. So is running them over with cars.

Looting and rioting IS a legitimate form of social protest, and without it it, years ago in Boston Harbor, things may have ended differently.

Looting and rioting for the sake of it, is not the same, and should be roundly condemned.

Being able to tell the difference is important. Understanding that there may be more than one type of group involved in these events is also important.

So who determines if it's valid or just for the sake of it ?
I haven't seen any valid looting yet..

[deanimator]

I'm sure that Anthony Sowell believes that rape, torture and murder are "valid" as well... as long as he's the one doing it.

[ArmedAviator]

https://theliberalgunclub.com/looting-and-rioting/

The Liberal Gun Club does not and will not equate the value of property with the value of human life. We believe those who are and continue to be oppressed do not need to be told by mostly straight, white folks how to protest or how to grieve.

We firmly believe shooting people to protect property is wrong, regardless of if its your television or the corner drug store at risk.

We firmly believe shooting people because they are protesting is wrong. So is running them over with cars.

Looting and rioting IS a legitimate form of social protest, and without it it, years ago in Boston Harbor, things may have ended differently.

Looting and rioting for the sake of it, is not the same, and should be roundly condemned.

Being able to tell the difference is important. Understanding that there may be more than one type of group involved in these events is also important.

So who determines if it's valid or just for the sake of it ?
I haven't seen any valid looting yet..

The prosecuting DA, judge, jury determine it. Unfortunately there's far too many DAs, judges, and potential jurors who believe this crap.

My stuff is an extension of me. Loot, burn it, or threaten it, and you're going to get a free side of lead if I catch you. And because of the formerly mentioned issue, I won't be calling the cops afterwards.

[Gramps]

https://theliberalgunclub.com/looting-and-rioting/

The Liberal Gun Club does not and will not equate the value of property with the value of human life. We believe those who are and continue to be oppressed do not need to be told by mostly straight, white folks how to protest or how to grieve.

We firmly believe shooting people to protect property is wrong, regardless of if its your television or the corner drug store at risk.

We firmly believe shooting people because they are protesting is wrong. So is running them over with cars.

Looting and rioting IS a legitimate form of social protest, and without it it, years ago in Boston Harbor, things may have ended differently.

Looting and rioting for the sake of it, is not the same, and should be roundly condemned.

Being able to tell the difference is important. Understanding that there may be more than one type of group involved in these events is also important.

So who determines if it's valid or just for the sake of it ?
I haven't seen any valid looting yet..

A joke right.......

[Bruenor]

https://theliberalgunclub.com/looting-and-rioting/

The Liberal Gun Club does not and will not equate the value of property with the value of human life. We believe those who are and continue to be oppressed do not need to be told by mostly straight, white folks how to protest or how to grieve.

We firmly believe shooting people to protect property is wrong, regardless of if its your television or the corner drug store at risk.

We firmly believe shooting people because they are protesting is wrong. So is running them over with cars.

Looting and rioting IS a legitimate form of social protest, and without it it, years ago in Boston Harbor, things may have ended differently.

Looting and rioting for the sake of it, is not the same, and should be roundly condemned.

Being able to tell the difference is important. Understanding that there may be more than one type of group involved in these events is also important.

So who determines if it's valid or just for the sake of it ?
I haven't seen any valid looting yet..

A joke right.......

Apparently not a joke, I took that right from their website,Link provided. Certainly shows while the 2A is for all, we certainly don't agree on every other position. Everyone has opinions on the Internet, and they are often worth exactly what you paid for them. So this opinion from the LGC is worth nothing to me, just more bad advice from the Internet like move the body before the police arrive, or the sound of racking a shotgun will make the bad guy relieve himself in his britches, don't shoot people that are destroying, stealing and burning everything you worked your whole life for, cause they need nice stuff too. not.