H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
rickt
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 3164
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:35 am
Location: Cuyahoga County

H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by rickt »

I have never seen so many cosponsors. Concealed Weapons License! Constitutional Carry! If only the Senate doesn't neuter this bill.
H. B. No. 174 - Representatives Hood (R), Brinkman (R).
Cosponsors: Representatives Vitale (R), Antani (R), Keller (R), Lang (R), Becker (R), Merrin (R), Koehler (R), Butler (R), Blessing (R), Jordan (R), Riedel (R), Schaffer (R), Dean (R), Manchester (R), Manning, D. (R), Carruthers (R), Smith, T. (R), Cross (R), Zeltwanger (R), Baldridge (R), Lipps (R), Smith, R. (R), Wiggam (R), Powell (R), Wilkin (R), McClain (R), Romanchuk (R).
To amend sections 109.69, 109.731, 311.41, 311.42, 311.43, 1547.69, 2921.13, 2923.11, 2923.12, 2923.121, 2923.122, 2923.123, 2923.124,
2923.125, 2923.126, 2923.127, 2923.128, 2923.129, 2923.1210, 2923.1211, 2923.1212, 2923.1213, 2923.16, 2953.37, and 4749.10 and to enact section 2923.111 of the Revised Code to modify the Weapons Law by renaming a concealed handgun license as a concealed weapons license, allowing a concealed weapons licensee to carry concealed all deadly weapons not otherwise prohibited by law, repealing a notice requirement applicable to licensees stopped for a law enforcement purpose, authorizing expungement of convictions of a violation of that requirement, allowing a person age 21 or older and not prohibited by federal law from firearm possession to carry a concealed deadly weapon without needing a license subject to the same carrying laws as a licensee, and correcting the definition of dangerous ordnance mistakenly resulting from Am. Sub. H.B. 228 of the 132nd General Assembly.
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legisl ... 133-HB-174
User avatar
WY_Not
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 2435
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Miami County, OH
Contact:

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by WY_Not »

They'll find a way to muck it up.
Learn how Project Appleseed is supporting freedom through Marksmanship and Heritage clinics.
Samuel Adams wrote:If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
M-Quigley
Posts: 4780
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by M-Quigley »

rickt wrote:I have never seen so many cosponsors. Concealed Weapons License! Constitutional Carry! If only the Senate doesn't neuter this bill.
H. B. No. 174 - Representatives Hood (R), Brinkman (R).
Cosponsors: Representatives Vitale (R), Antani (R), Keller (R), Lang (R), Becker (R), Merrin (R), Koehler (R), Butler (R), Blessing (R), Jordan (R), Riedel (R), Schaffer (R), Dean (R), Manchester (R), Manning, D. (R), Carruthers (R), Smith, T. (R), Cross (R), Zeltwanger (R), Baldridge (R), Lipps (R), Smith, R. (R), Wiggam (R), Powell (R), Wilkin (R), McClain (R), Romanchuk (R).
To amend sections 109.69, 109.731, 311.41, 311.42, 311.43, 1547.69, 2921.13, 2923.11, 2923.12, 2923.121, 2923.122, 2923.123, 2923.124,
2923.125, 2923.126, 2923.127, 2923.128, 2923.129, 2923.1210, 2923.1211, 2923.1212, 2923.1213, 2923.16, 2953.37, and 4749.10 and to enact section 2923.111 of the Revised Code to modify the Weapons Law by renaming a concealed handgun license as a concealed weapons license, allowing a concealed weapons licensee to carry concealed all deadly weapons not otherwise prohibited by law, repealing a notice requirement applicable to licensees stopped for a law enforcement purpose, authorizing expungement of convictions of a violation of that requirement, allowing a person age 21 or older and not prohibited by federal law from firearm possession to carry a concealed deadly weapon without needing a license subject to the same carrying laws as a licensee, and correcting the definition of dangerous ordnance mistakenly resulting from Am. Sub. H.B. 228 of the 132nd General Assembly.
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legisl ... 133-HB-174
Regarding the part I bolded and underlined, what are they referring to? I thought it was already corrected?
User avatar
JustaShooter
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
Posts: 5800
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 3:08 pm
Location: Akron/Canton Area

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by JustaShooter »

M-Quigley wrote:
rickt wrote:I have never seen so many cosponsors. Concealed Weapons License! Constitutional Carry! If only the Senate doesn't neuter this bill.
H. B. No. 174 - Representatives Hood (R), Brinkman (R).
Cosponsors: Representatives Vitale (R), Antani (R), Keller (R), Lang (R), Becker (R), Merrin (R), Koehler (R), Butler (R), Blessing (R), Jordan (R), Riedel (R), Schaffer (R), Dean (R), Manchester (R), Manning, D. (R), Carruthers (R), Smith, T. (R), Cross (R), Zeltwanger (R), Baldridge (R), Lipps (R), Smith, R. (R), Wiggam (R), Powell (R), Wilkin (R), McClain (R), Romanchuk (R).
To amend sections 109.69, 109.731, 311.41, 311.42, 311.43, 1547.69, 2921.13, 2923.11, 2923.12, 2923.121, 2923.122, 2923.123, 2923.124,
2923.125, 2923.126, 2923.127, 2923.128, 2923.129, 2923.1210, 2923.1211, 2923.1212, 2923.1213, 2923.16, 2953.37, and 4749.10 and to enact section 2923.111 of the Revised Code to modify the Weapons Law by renaming a concealed handgun license as a concealed weapons license, allowing a concealed weapons licensee to carry concealed all deadly weapons not otherwise prohibited by law, repealing a notice requirement applicable to licensees stopped for a law enforcement purpose, authorizing expungement of convictions of a violation of that requirement, allowing a person age 21 or older and not prohibited by federal law from firearm possession to carry a concealed deadly weapon without needing a license subject to the same carrying laws as a licensee, and correcting the definition of dangerous ordnance mistakenly resulting from Am. Sub. H.B. 228 of the 132nd General Assembly.
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legisl ... 133-HB-174
Regarding the part I bolded and underlined, what are they referring to? I thought it was already corrected?
Yes, it was - that's what HB86 was for, which takes effect today along with (most of) HB228. I wonder what that's about...

EDIT: I just looked at that part of the bill, and it indeed tries to fix what is already fixed, so LSC will have to update the bill appropriately.
Christian, Husband, Father
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Pistol & Rifle Instructor

Want to become more active with OFCC and help fight for your rights? Click Here!
User avatar
pirateguy191
Posts: 11009
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:06 pm
Location: 44146

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by pirateguy191 »

BAN BFA FROM THE STATEHOUSE NOW!!!!!!
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." - Ronald Reagan

"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." ~ Mike Vanderboegh

NRA member, NRA basic pistol instructor, DBACB
bignflnut
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
Contact:

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by bignflnut »

The Buckeye State could be the next to adopt permitless concealed carry under a bill introduced in the Ohio House this week.

The proposal, House Bill 174, is already backed by nearly 30 Republican lawmakers. The move would modify the state’s current laws to delete the requirement to first obtain a permit to carry a concealed handgun in Ohio, a move that sponsors say is past due.

“We need to get our constitutional rights back,” state Rep. Tom Brinkman, R- Mt. Lookout, told the Cincinnati Enquirer. “The law-abiding citizens are under attack every day.”

The bill would keep Ohio’s current licensing program in place for those who want to use it for the purpose of reciprocity with some 30 other states while traveling.
So you're telling me there's a chance...
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908

Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.

"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
User avatar
rickt
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 3164
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:35 am
Location: Cuyahoga County

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by rickt »

HB 174 hasn't yet been assigned to committee but is this in preparation for what will probably a contentious debate on Constitutional Carry? The House Federalism Committee has the following on next weeks agenda.
SCHEDULE TOPIC Possession & Use of Firearms

Unless otherwise notified by the Chairman prior to this week’s meeting, the Committee will hear informal testimony introducing Members to both sides of the debate regarding the possession and use of firearms. The Chair will allow one witness from either side of the debate to provide a presentation prior to questions from the Members of the Committee.

The two witnesses are to be announced.
http://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/cm_p ... notice.pdf

Who will be testifying for the pro-gun side? BFA? OFCC?
User avatar
Chuck
OFCC Director
OFCC Director
Posts: 4753
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Licking County

Re: H.B. 174: Remove notification; CHL --> CWL + more

Post by Chuck »

Thank you Rickt for posting this. I am a couple days behind.

This is good news indeed. LAst GA, when Speaker Householder was just Representative Housesolder, he was a cosponsor of that GA's Constitutional Carry bill, and I am confident that this bill will move through the House, at least.

Folks, please, read this and pick it apart. Find anything that needs fixed, was left out, or just something else we want.
As some of you have already pointed out, there will be amendments made, I would like to have our list ready when the time comes.
Ain't activism fun?

"Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " - George Washington

"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something.
And because I can not do everything, I will not refuse to do the something I can do.
What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of GOD, I will do."
- Edward Everett Hale (descendant of Nathan Hale)
Post Reply