Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby wobblygoblin » Thu Aug 18, 2022 10:51 am

Senator Matt Dolan, the same Dolan who’s family owns the Indians and didn’t stand up to woke pressure to change the team’s century old name, has introduced this bill. I haven’t read it yet but I’m betting it’s filled with nonsense because it mentions protection orders.

https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legisl ... 134-SB-357
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -Thomas Jefferson

"If stupidity weighed an ounce and gullibility a gram, the population of this country would create a black hole that would swallow the planet."
User avatar
wobblygoblin
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:10 pm
Location: Westerville, Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby WhyNot » Fri Aug 19, 2022 7:26 am

...see? It's the right way to do the WRONG thing.

...See ?

:P
Acquisitions thus far:

-Slingshot
-Butter knife
-Soda straw and peas
-Sharpened pencil
-Newspaper roll
--water balloon (*diversionary*)

Yeah, I'm that good
WhyNot
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am
Location: NW Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby M-Quigley » Fri Aug 19, 2022 11:28 am

I haven't read the bill itself yet but a local TV station was reporting part of the bill was that anyone who wanted to buy a gun and was younger than 21 had to have someone older than 21 sign off on it and that in doing so they would be legally responsible for the actions of the person under 21 (unless the gun is a single shot firearm)

IMO that's just crazy liability wise. I don't care who it is, under or over 21, I'm not signing anything that says I'm legally responsible for someone else's actions. ANYONE (including law enforcement) has the potential to do something wrong with a firearm, regardless of how good a person they are 99.9% of the time.
M-Quigley
 
Posts: 4382
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby M-Quigley » Fri Aug 19, 2022 11:38 am

Okay, just looked at the bill, should've done that before posting I guess. Regarding my previous post the news media was (again) partially wrong. The co signer has to be at least 25, not 21, and in addition to a single shot firearm being exempt, a double barrel firearm is also exempt, as long as each barrel has to be manually reloaded after firing.
M-Quigley
 
Posts: 4382
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby WhyNot » Fri Aug 19, 2022 2:35 pm

M-Quigley wrote:...and in addition to a single shot firearm being exempt, a double barrel firearm is also exempt, as long as each barrel has to be manually reloaded after firing.


Gee that's mighty um,er, GENEROUS of you, Senator Matt :P .

Perhaps Senator Matt can explain how Bruen relates to rifle purchasers sans 21? Married with kiddies BUT... 20?

Or, was there long gun restrictions on them yungins b4 1791? Hmm? :lol:
Acquisitions thus far:

-Slingshot
-Butter knife
-Soda straw and peas
-Sharpened pencil
-Newspaper roll
--water balloon (*diversionary*)

Yeah, I'm that good
WhyNot
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
 
Posts: 1170
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am
Location: NW Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby FormerNavy » Fri Aug 19, 2022 6:58 pm

WhyNot wrote:Or, was there long gun restrictions on them yungins b4 1791? Hmm? :lol:



Not according to The Patriot :D
User avatar
FormerNavy
 
Posts: 2288
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Southwest Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby M-Quigley » Sat Aug 20, 2022 10:37 am

WhyNot wrote:
M-Quigley wrote:...and in addition to a single shot firearm being exempt, a double barrel firearm is also exempt, as long as each barrel has to be manually reloaded after firing.


Gee that's mighty um,er, GENEROUS of you, Senator Matt :P .


It's not just that, according to the TV news story he (generously) said he won't support a complete gun ban. :P
M-Quigley
 
Posts: 4382
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:06 pm
Location: Western Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby Brian D. » Sun Aug 21, 2022 6:25 am

"And starring James Arness, as Matt Dolan." Sorry, that's what kept running through my head during Dolan's 'tough on crime, gonna fight for you!!' campaign ads.
Quit worrying, hide your gun well, shut up, and CARRY that handgun!

********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
Brian D.
 
Posts: 15933
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:42 pm
Location: SW Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357

Postby kcclark » Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:14 am

The bill in question is SB 357, and though it’s been bottled up in committee for most of the year, there’s now a push to move the bill forward during the legislature’s lame-duck session


On Tuesday, the Senate Finance Committee held its first hearing on SB 357, but didn’t hold a vote on the measure.


Clearly DeWine is hoping to capitalize on his overwhelming victory last week, but whether or not his Republican colleagues in the statehouse have had a change of heart about his gun proposals is still very much up in the air. The first test will be a vote in the Senate Finance Committee, and Ohio gun owners should be reaching out to those committee members to share their concerns before the bill has a chance to reach the Senate floor.


https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2022/11/16/dewine-allies-push-for-passage-of-strong-ohio-gun-bill-in-lame-duck-session-n64447
kcclark
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
 
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:16 pm
Location: Central Ohio

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby bignflnut » Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:20 pm

DeWhine.
Please.

Who puts this stuff forward? Who decides when to consider this nuttiness?

Pasture for Richard and Franny.
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, Mar 14, 1908
Republicans.Hate.You.See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia Oct 11, 1798
bignflnut
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 8097
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge

Re: Senate Bill 357 (no I’m not kidding)

Postby FormerNavy » Sat Nov 19, 2022 12:29 pm

I don't see this going anywhere with the current legislature. The only reason The Guv ended the COVID emergency order stuff was because this legislature was about to ram and end right down his throat. Clearly, they are not beholden to him... large victory or not.
User avatar
FormerNavy
 
Posts: 2288
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: Southwest Ohio

Re: Upcoming hearing on 357

Postby kcclark » Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:00 am

November 29th is going to be the 2nd hearing for 357. Dolan is the chair of the committee and the sponsor of the bill. He can move things along to get it out of committee. The bottom of the committee meeting notice says "Possible Vote."

https://ohiosenate.gov/committees/finance
kcclark
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
 
Posts: 1223
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:16 pm
Location: Central Ohio


Return to Tweed Ring's Ohio Politics and Legislation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest