HB 395 : Another anti-bump fire bill

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
rickt
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 3164
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:35 am
Location: Cuyahoga County

HB 395 : Another anti-bump fire bill

Post by rickt »

H. B. No. 395 - Representative Patmon.
Cosponsors: Representatives Galonski, Smith, K., Kent, West.
To enact section 2923.133 of the Revised Code to prohibit the manufacture, sale, or transfer of any trigger crank, bump-fire device, or other product that accelerates a semi-automatic firearm's rate of fire but does not convert it into an automatic firearm.
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legisl ... 132-HB-395
zeko
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 7:55 pm
Location: Morrow County

Re: HB 395 : Another anti-bump fire bill

Post by zeko »

I noticed today that while this bill's senate companion, SB219, hasn't yet been assigned to a committee, HB395 has been assigned to the House Federalism and Interstate Relations committee. Further, the operant part of the bill would seem to ban much more than bump-fire stocks:

Sec. 2923.133. (A) No person shall manufacture, sell, or transfer a trigger crank, a bump-fire device, or any part, combination of parts, component, device, attachment, or accessory that is designed or functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm but not convert the semi-automatic firearm into an automatic firearm.

"Part" or "component" could refer to any kind of improved trigger (not just a binary trigger) that made operation smoother (perhaps a replacement for a defective trigger?) and hence "accelerated" the rate of fire, even by a very small amount. Stretching the definition? Certainly . . . but I don't doubt that the antis would love to stretch things even farther if given the opportunity.

Zeko
qmti
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 664
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:18 pm

Re: HB 395 : Another anti-bump fire bill

Post by qmti »

rickt wrote:
H. B. No. 395 - Representative Patmon.
Cosponsors: Representatives Galonski, Smith, K., Kent, West.
To enact section 2923.133 of the Revised Code to prohibit the manufacture, sale, or transfer of any trigger crank, bump-fire device, or other product that accelerates a semi-automatic firearm's rate of fire but does not convert it into an automatic firearm.
https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legisl ... 132-HB-395

I noticed sponsor and co-sponsors are all Democrats. Why am I not surprised by this new bill being introduced.
bignflnut
Volunteer
Volunteer
Posts: 8135
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
Contact:

Re: HB 395 : Another anti-bump fire bill

Post by bignflnut »

It's difficult to stand out as a Dem these days, what with their lock-step conformity of thought (lest they be banished from the shire).
Proposing a bill, is one way to say, trust me, I'm ready to get the job done (i.e. I will take away freedom from the people you hate).
Being the target of the NRA is a serious resume enhancer and fundraising positive in the Swamp.
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908

Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.

"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Post Reply