Obama excuses Muslims but not gun owners

[AlanM]

Obama Excuses Muslim Majority for Sins of Few, Won’t Extend Same Courtesy to Gun Owners

During a February 2 visit to the Islamic Society of Baltimore, President Obama excused the Muslim majority for the sins of a few, but he refuses to extend that same courtesy to law-abiding gun owners throughout our land.

Fox News tweeted a quote from Obama, as he looked at Muslims gathered in a mosque and said, “As Muslim Americans… your entire community so often is targeted or blamed for the violent acts of the very few.”

Yet just two days after a lone gunman used his firearms to shoot and kill 9 innocents in a gun-free zone at Umpqua Community College, Obama called for more gun control for all gun owners.

He responded the same way after the Aurora movie theater attack (July 20, 2012), Sandy Hook Elementary attack (December 14, 2012), Santa Barbara attack (May 23, 2014), and the San Bernardino attack (December 2, 2015). In each of these cases, Obama’s response was to characterize gun owners in general in light of the twisted actions of “very few.”

I'm firmly of the opinion that these two positions of Zeros are two sides of the same coin. IMHO, his whole purpose in life is to destroy the USA.

[bignflnut]

IMHO, his whole purpose in life is to destroy the USA.

When we common folk can agree to assertions like this and then realize how our political "leaders" have not attempted to slow his roll in the least...one would think "the establishment" would be a faint memory.

[curmudgeon3]

Is it any wonder that one of the presidential candidates has made his campaign theme "MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" ? By the time Zero's remaining 349 days are over it'll be about like rebuilding war-torn Europe for his successor.

[keepitsimple]

President of a few, not many.

I know a lot of Americans that wouldn't spit on him if he were on fire.

[bignflnut]

Here's a fun sampling of quotes on the groups in question.

[Mustang380gal]

Just keep the TOS and civility in mind as you post. Thank you.

[carmen fovozzo]

Funny, how many are knocking Rubio for saying that over and over again....

[Mustang380gal]

Funny, how many are knocking Rubio for saying that over and over again....

It's the pundits who like the establishment. They like their "power." Cruz is saying it, too, from what Rush said yesterday.

[carmen fovozzo]

And the large one Christy....who has no room to talk about anyone on stage...What the heck is he even still there for ? He is a no body..

[eye95]

President of a few, not many.

I know a lot of Americans that wouldn't spit on him if he were on fire.

I would put the fire out with an appropriate material. I hate everything he stands for, but he is still a person, and I would have to help him

[WY_Not]

aka anything flammable.

...an appropriate material.

[WestonDon]

I would put the fire out with an appropriate material. I hate everything he stands for, but he is still a person, and I would have to help him

So would I. Just to spare us the cost of renaming thousands of bridges and streets.

[docachna]

Funny, how many are knocking Rubio for saying that over and over again....

He was a bit of a "one-trick pony" while being pressed on it, but he's exactly right. There's been nothing "coincidental" or "accidental" about any of BHO's actions since he was elected. He's doing everything his handlers desire of him. Valerie Jarrett and the rest of Chicago political mafia will whisk him out of town to a multi-million dollar Hawaii retirement villa, to live out his days getting $500,000 per speech and enjoying lifetime Secret Service protection - on your dime. Meanwhile, the elite go on to the next "designee" to do their bidding.

Rubio was right - just could have stated his case a tad better.