The Military Coup Against Donald Trump of 2018, Part 2

[JU-87]

The Military Coup Against Donald Trump of 2018, Part 2

Secretary Mattis could not raise the White House, nor the Pentagon. He did raise several combatant commanders around the globe – some had no idea what was up, some pledged loyalty, and some apologized and told him this was for the best. Some hedged; Mattis would not have it.

“You better decide if you’re a patriot or a traitor, and if you choose wrong so help me, I’ll see you hang,” he told one coup-curious Air Force four star. Mattis heard the officer gulp on the other end of the line before pledging his loyalty...

https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtsch ... 2-n2362194" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[glocksmith]

“The continental United States,” the general replied, annoyed. “We have maybe 45 brigade combat teams total available, counting everything active and reserve, Marine and Army. Less than one per state. And a city takes a brigade to control – at least. New York would take ten. And that’s assuming they were all loyal to us. There’s police and federal law enforcement too, but we also have 100 million armed Americans who might object.”

I've been saying this for years. The Armed Citizenry is the true power in this country. If, no when, they decide to take to the streets, that will be the end of our government in its present incarnation.

[JU-87]

You are correct.

THAT is the real reason for the Second Amendment. Some here don't understand that...

[Javelin Man]

I thought the 2nd Amendment was just so we could keep hunting.... That's why we can keep arms for bears.

[Bianchi?]

I thought the 2nd Amendment was just so we could keep hunting.... That's why we can keep arms for bears.

No no no. It's so we can hang a pair of bear arms on our walls.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpeUznIhgLU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[JU-87]

What Does the Second Amendment Mean?
By David Deming

...Contrary to what some confused and unlettered judges think, the Second Amendment does indeed protect an individual right. Neither is it opaque or difficult to understand. A militia is "a citizen army," an entity that is most definitely distinct from a professional military. The Second Amendment becomes perfectly lucid when we understand that the "well regulated" militia spoken of in the Amendment is to be composed of a people who have right to keep and bear arms. The two clauses of the Second Amendment, the first which refers to a "militia," and the second which refers to "the people," cannot be separated and interpreted independently. For the Second Amendment to be intelligible the two clauses must be reconciled. Indeed, it is very difficult to assemble a militia from a people who have been disarmed...

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles ... _mean.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[glocksmith]

Charlottesville....https://crowdsondemand.com/