Update:
https://abc7chicago.com/watch-live-pitt ... y/4565140/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
PITTSBURGH, Penn. --
A shooter opened fire during a baby naming ceremony at a Pittsburgh synagogue on Saturday, killing at least 10 people and wounding six others including four police officers who dashed to the scene, authorities said.
President Donald Trump called the shooting "far more devastating than anyone thought," saying "it's a terrible thing what's going on with hate in our country."
Trump also said the outcome might have been different if the synagogue "had some kind of protection" from an armed guard and suggested that might be a good idea for all churches and synagogues.
When I heard this reported on the radio, my first thought was that it was irresponsible for Trump to comment on the synagogue's security or whether it would've helped or not, before all the facts are in. That's what the anti gunners do, react without knowing all the facts. Such as this guy.
Offering a different take, Pennsylvania Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, called the shooting an "absolute tragedy" in a statement that made reference to calls for tighter gun control laws.
A statement made without any knowledge or even caring whether any gun control measure could've even stopped this guy from getting a gun anyway.
My initial thought was that it was inconceivable in this day and age that a synagogue wouldn't have some kind of armed security nowadays. To not have it is extremely negligent and irresponsible IMO. I thought that unless Trump knew something the public didn't, he shouldn't have answered those reporters questions off the cuff like that. I was however wrong about Trump in this instance.
ABC affiliate WTAE reported that the synagogue usually has security present, but did not on Saturday.
Insanity is doing the same things over and over and expecting different results Author unknown