Ohio Supreme Court declines CLE's gun law appeal

[rickt]

so did the city at least have to pay OFCC's legal bill for this one ? (or the trial that wrapped up last April ?)

We're hoping that will happen next, and none too soon, I might add.
We have a pile of money wrapped up in this

Which is why the Ohio Supreme Court's decision a few months ago on the Oberlin case was a big win. It significantly improves OFCC's chances of collecting legal expenses in these cases.

[Morne]

so did the city at least have to pay OFCC's legal bill for this one ? (or the trial that wrapped up last April ?)

We're hoping that will happen next, and none too soon, I might add.
We have a pile of money wrapped up in this

Which is why the Ohio Supreme Court's decision a few months ago on the Oberlin case was a big win. It significantly improves OFCC's chances of collecting legal expenses in these cases.

we sure hope so. Tens of thousands of dollars have been sunk into these cases. And we still owe more than $20K to lawyers. Not kidding.

Litigation is EXPENSIVE!!!

[Brian D.]

Boots-on-the-pavement protests (yes, protests, that's the tone which is called for) which highlight not only the gun law violations, but also the WASTE of taxpayer dollars, with some best guesstimates of how much, might get Tea Party as well as 2nd Amendment folks to come out.

Fighting back that way costs almost nothing, except time.

[pirateguy191]

Protests? I'm in.