Ah, yes...death is a very lucrative business for the government (and, to be fair, some attorneys).Werz wrote:Don't forget about probate.sodbuster95 wrote:The government isn't really in the "marriage" business as much as it's in the divorce business. Unfortunately, the vast majority of those problems (child rearing and support, division of real and personal property, etc.) are far from "minuscule" and having nothing to do with whether or not a church may or may not have recognized the "marriage."
Family Research council shooting
Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators
- sodbuster95
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 6954
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:14 pm
- Location: Maumee
- Contact:
Re: Family Research council shooting
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Information posted in these forums is my personal opinion only. It is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
Information posted in these forums is my personal opinion only. It is not intended, nor should it be construed, as legal advice.
- BB62
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:57 pm
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
Re: Family Research council shooting
Or at least it's germane.wkdravenna wrote:Its part of the statement the guy was making. Its Jermaine to the story.
(but Mr. Jackson thanks you for the shout-out)
Yes, I do believe in open carry. An openly armed man is clear in his intentions. Concealed carriers are sneaks and skulkers and elitist, boot licking, political contribution making, running dog lackies of The Man. <wink> (thx grumpycoconut - OpenCarry.org)
Got Freedom?
Accountant, Computer & Management Consultant
Scuba Diver, NRA Life Member, NRA Instructor
Got Freedom?
Accountant, Computer & Management Consultant
Scuba Diver, NRA Life Member, NRA Instructor
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8135
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
- Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
- Contact:
Re: Family Research council shooting
Again, doesn't matter if he's a D, R, I, G, LGBTI (yeah, they added an I), Pan, red. yellow, black, white, tea party, occupier, etc. What this person DID is the crime. Not what he thought.Tweed Ring wrote:I'd like to know more about this young man. Is he a registered voter? What are his politics? Does he lean Occupy Wall Street or Tea Party? Was it George Bush or Michelle Bachmann who supplied the firearm?
Should be fun to hear the liberals distance themselves from this guy without being hypocrites the way they insist Tim McVeigh is / was/ will ever be a Christian (cannot be simply disowned). Will they shower moral outrage on this guy or will they sympathize that he "had no other path, in his mind"? Will they come right out and call him a knuckle-dragger? Watch the contortions.
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8135
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
- Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
- Contact:
Re: Family Research council shooting
Although the media did not immediately blame conservatives or the Tea Party in this instance, here is a list of recent events where such groups were initially connected, only to find out that this was entirely false. First impressions are all important, no?
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8135
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
- Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
- Contact:
Re: Family Research council shooting
Human Rights Campaign (HRC) confirms that they still regard Family Research Council (FRC) a "hate group", a moniker not given to any Islamic religious group (although they share the same political position on certain issues).
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
-
- Posts: 17812
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am
Re: Family Research council shooting
Having witnessed the endless feeding frenzy of the Democrat Press Corps blaming any available Conservatives for any such atrocities, I just assumed this was just a wandering Tea Party type who, armed secretly by some right winger, attacked the wrong building...jabeatty wrote:FRC is a Christian organization, and the young man is (supposedly) an LGBT activist.Tweed Ring wrote:I'd like to know more about this young man. Is he a registered voter? What are his politics? Does he lean Occupy Wall Street or Tea Party? Was it George Bush or Michelle Bachmann who supplied the firearm?
-
- Posts: 17812
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am
Re: Family Research council shooting
Sure it matters. If he is a Liberal, my people can use that fact in a political manner. But, if he is a white Hispanic, then it's a zero sum game.bignflnut wrote:Again, doesn't matter if he's a D, R, I, G, LGBTI (yeah, they added an I), Pan, red. yellow, black, white, tea party, occupier, etc. What this person DID is the crime. Not what he thought.Tweed Ring wrote:I'd like to know more about this young man. Is he a registered voter? What are his politics? Does he lean Occupy Wall Street or Tea Party? Was it George Bush or Michelle Bachmann who supplied the firearm?
Should be fun to hear the liberals distance themselves from this guy without being hypocrites the way they insist Tim McVeigh is / was/ will ever be a Christian (cannot be simply disowned). Will they shower moral outrage on this guy or will they sympathize that he "had no other path, in his mind"? Will they come right out and call him a knuckle-dragger? Watch the contortions.
- MrKitty
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:41 am
- Location: Youngstown, OH
Re: Family Research council shooting
Lol. We all have people in our "groups" or social circles we're ashamed of.
Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
-Thomas Paine
-Thomas Paine
- wkdravenna
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:08 pm
- Location: Toledo Ohio
Re: Family Research council shooting
You got me. I wasen't sure if it was a J or a G.BB62 wrote:Or at least it's germane.wkdravenna wrote:Its part of the statement the guy was making. Its Jermaine to the story.
(but Mr. Jackson thanks you for the shout-out)
English isn't my first language.
My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. - JFK
-
- Posts: 508
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:36 pm
Re: Family Research council shooting
What's so funny about jimmy Mcjunkin....BorisTheSpider wrote:I know I'm not supposed to, but come on - how can you not giggle when you see that name? It's like FBI agents get to create their own aliases, and this guy got in when he was 12.Cybercop wrote:...James McJunkin, the head of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, said authorities do not yet know the gunman's motive.
Now back to your regularly-scheduled political mutterings...
-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:19 pm
- Location: Hamilton, OH
Re: Family Research council shooting
The media whiffs again....
"Neither NBC Nightly News nor CBS Evening News produced a full story on the FRC shooting, instead committing only 17 and 20 seconds respectively for anchor briefs that omitted the shooter's motive," Media Research Center reported.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/media ... ing-80134/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Neither NBC Nightly News nor CBS Evening News produced a full story on the FRC shooting, instead committing only 17 and 20 seconds respectively for anchor briefs that omitted the shooter's motive," Media Research Center reported.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/media ... ing-80134/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Volunteer
- Posts: 8135
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:14 pm
- Location: Under Naybob Tinfoil Bridge
- Contact:
Re: Family Research council shooting
Something seems missing from this story. Is this not a premeditated act? Hearing a lot of crickets when it comes to the "how did THIS guy get a gun?" from the libs.Corkins was charged with transporting firearms and ammunition across state lines and assault with the intent to kill while armed. The transportation charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years; the assault charge, 30 years.
Hearing a lot of "back off the SPLC"
While blaming Corkins for the shooting, Perkins also faulted the Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based civil rights organization that tracks and litigates against hate groups. The law center labeled the council a hate group in 2010 for what it called the organization's anti-gay stance.
“It’s not that we don’t have enough scoundrels to curse; it’s that we don’t have enough good men to curse them.”–G.K. Chesterton-Illustrated London News, 3-14-1908
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
Republicans.Hate.You. See2020.
"Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams to Mass Militia 10-11-1798
-
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 2281
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:50 am
- Location: North East Ohio
Re: Family Research council shooting
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/3 ... &page=full" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
In this shooting case, no outrage from the media
Leftwing gunman doesn't fit narrative
But this time the story line had changed considerably. The shooter was decidedly to the left of the political spectrum. His target, a conservative pro-life group. Keeping these facts in mind and watching how the event was covered - or not covered - in the media over the past few days has taught me two things:
1. The gun control debate is not real - it's merely political posturing.
2. The extreme left is just as capable of violence as the extreme right.
-
- Posts: 17812
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am
Re: Family Research council shooting
The Family Research Council does not meet the Leftist media's criterion to meet "victim status." I do not know much about the Family Research Council; supposedly, they support a traditional view of marriage (man and woman) and are against gay marriage. They lobby and raise money to sustain their efforts, in the marketplace of ideas, and in the various state capitols in which they operate. NONE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED IS ILLEGAL.
Other individuals and organizations are free to likewise disavow traditional marriage and support gay marriage. None of their efforts are illegal, either. But when Conservatives and/or Liberals break the law, either in word or in deed, then they must so answer for these transgressions.
Other individuals and organizations are free to likewise disavow traditional marriage and support gay marriage. None of their efforts are illegal, either. But when Conservatives and/or Liberals break the law, either in word or in deed, then they must so answer for these transgressions.