Be warned, to conform with forum rules, this discussion will not turn in to a political discussion. I felt this story was relevant because of the quoted line above, how it relates to the philosophy of 2A, and how this may effect the future of 2A.McCain felt the crowds assembled in support of Obama and such would be detrimental to our country and it would do our nation no good for this to drag out like last go around, coupled with the possibility of domestic violence. (Emphasis added.)
So, now it's out. McCain knew Obama's crew fixed the elections in PA and OH all along, but one of the reasons they specifically didn't pursue it was because of "domestic violence," a.k.a., violent protests and armed rebellion. Is a fixed election enough to spark the fires of right wing rebellion? Will this development, brought about by Wikileaks (whom I believe is severely irresponsible, but that's neither here nor there), be yet another straw on the backs of the gun control camels? McCain was afraid of "domestic" violence. I wonder what O's cronies were afraid of...
Or was McCain afraid of leftist domestic violence? Was McCain afraid the crowds would turn into angry mobs simply because he would have been accusing the first black President of fixing an election? Doesn't this prove the 2A is alive and well, to defend ourselves against domestic violence from the left?
What are your thoughts?
More from the Examiner: http://www.examiner.com/article/latest- ... 8-election" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
At issue is internal communication within a company in Texas called Stratfor. The company bills itself as a 'global intelligence service' that offers confidential information to large corporations and political entities.