HB 142 Proponent Testimony 5-16-2017

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Coordinators, Moderators

Re: HB 142 Proponent Testimony 5-16-2017

Postby AlanM » Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:12 pm

Even more recent 2016 vs 2013 is this national survey of police chiefs.

28th Annual National Survey Results
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
AlanM
 
Posts: 8969
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:38 am
Location: Was Stow, OH now Charlottesville, VA

Re: HB 142 Proponent Testimony 5-16-2017

Postby 3FULLMAGS+1 » Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:19 pm

AlanM wrote:Even more recent 2016 vs 2013 is this national survey of police chiefs.

28th Annual National Survey Results


Thanks for that link, Alan.

Like justashooter and I said , most LE are on our side as far as carrying a firearm is concerned........and the small % that isn't still looks at us as
peasants, and those are more than likely the ones causing the problems and why we need to get rid of notification.
Darrel
They say the best "Home Remedy" for "tyranny" is....."LEAD POISONING".
3FULLMAGS+1
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: S.W. corner of stark. co.

Re: HB 142 Proponent Testimony 5-16-2017

Postby AlanM » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:25 pm

Note that that survey was answered by police chiefs that were anonymous as far as the people that could fire them knew.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
AlanM
 
Posts: 8969
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:38 am
Location: Was Stow, OH now Charlottesville, VA

Re: HB 142 Proponent Testimony 5-16-2017

Postby WestonDon » Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:48 pm

AlanM wrote:Note that that survey was answered by police chiefs that were anonymous as far as the people that could fire them knew.


That explains a lot.
I believe in American exceptianalism
Fear the government that fears your guns
NRA endowment life member
WestonDon
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
 
Posts: 2533
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:30 pm
Location: Wood county

Re: HB 142 Proponent Testimony 5-16-2017

Postby 3FULLMAGS+1 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:46 am

Both servey's mentioned here in this discussion were polled anonymously.

A freaking shame when you can't speak your mind because those above you won't allow it !

To bad we can't put an anonymous poll out there for officers just in the state of Ohio to answer and see what kind of results we get......or can we ?
Darrel
They say the best "Home Remedy" for "tyranny" is....."LEAD POISONING".
3FULLMAGS+1
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: S.W. corner of stark. co.

Previous

Return to Tweed Ring's Ohio Politics and Legislation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest