Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Discussion of Firearm Politics & Legislation. This forum is now strictly limited to discussions directly related to firearms.

Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators

User avatar
Klingon00
Posts: 3825
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:47 am
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by Klingon00 »

techguy85 wrote:Also keep in mind that unless something has changed, this bill would currently greatly expand the number of prohibited persons by removing the restoration of rights Ohio currently extends to those who complete community control for non-violent offences.
I have a problem with that.
That's the basic explanation I heard and I don't like the way it currently is (the way I understand it). It seems to me that if Ohio has a process to restore rights, that should extend to all rights, including firearms.

Hopefully this can get fixed, if 203 can ever get moving...
User avatar
color of law
*** Banned ***
Posts: 3623
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Cincinnati area

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by color of law »

I voluntarily left this forum and I am voluntarily returning. The length of the stay will all depend.

Though Werz and I on occasion butt heads, this issue of HB 203 dealing with the incorporation of federal law is a dangerous move for the citizens of this State. And dangerous in all realms of subject matter.

As Werz has said, this is unsettled law in the federal courts and now we are going to allow our state courts to attempt to weigh in with their opinion, not good. I'd rather see this bill die than allow this annexation of federal law.

Overtly or covertly OFCC and Buckeye need to get together and get this federal intrusion stopped.

Just my 2¢ worth.
WhyNot
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 1227
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am
Location: NW Ohio

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by WhyNot »

Let us all presume sometime in the future there's a state of OH legislature shift and NOT Conservative. Let us all chant the liberal chant...'' oh! great gov't! Cometh and saveth us from this state CHL, using Fed regulations to hinder, hamper, supresseth!"

I will also presume there's left/liberal think tanks inside the bypass Ohio already plotting, scamming, scemeing this scenario.....
.....
Now for something completely 8) unrelated;Oh look! Inside the beltway! Senator Feinstein is asking Prez. Obama to ''just do it'' re: gun restrictions. Do exec things, regulations. Just ''wave that majik wand'' 8) .

WAIT TILL AFTER MIDTERMS , probably right around January for the next clog-the toilet with nasties, as is the normal course in politik timing.
Acquisitions thus far:

-Slingshot
-Butter knife
-Soda straw and peas
-Sharpened pencil
-Newspaper roll
--water balloon (*diversionary*)

Yeah, I'm that good
Tweed Ring
Posts: 17812
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by Tweed Ring »

Due to the control of decennial redistricting of state senate/house districts, the OGA will rest comfortably in Republican hands for the rest of this decade. Due to the influence of down state Republicans, the OGA will continue to lean right for that time.
mreising
Posts: 6274
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warren County

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by mreising »

Tweed Ring wrote: Due to the influence of down state Republicans, the OGA will continue to lean right for that time.
You're welcome. :wink:
The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny

Mark
NRA Training Counselor-Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, Reloading, Personal Protection in the Home, Personal Protection Outside the Home, Home Firearms Safety, Chief RSO. NRA Endowment Life member.
curmudgeon3
Posts: 6534
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:31 pm

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by curmudgeon3 »

Go down-state Republicans !!
mreising
Posts: 6274
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warren County

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by mreising »

curmudgeon3 wrote:Go down-state Republicans !!
That's better than "Go down, state Republicans" :wink:
The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny

Mark
NRA Training Counselor-Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, Reloading, Personal Protection in the Home, Personal Protection Outside the Home, Home Firearms Safety, Chief RSO. NRA Endowment Life member.
curmudgeon3
Posts: 6534
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:31 pm

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by curmudgeon3 »

mreising wrote:
curmudgeon3 wrote:Go down-state Republicans !!
That's better than "Go down, state Republicans" :wink:
Yeah, punctuation can be critical in some cases.
WhyNot
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 1227
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am
Location: NW Ohio

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by WhyNot »

(D)Sherod Brown(D) who? And(D)when was it that S.Brown was (D)Sec. of State Ohio? Brunner (D)got Sec State.

Gov Strickland (D)got in although he was a middle roader pro gun. But alas, this new crop with pro-NRA ratings have pushed anti-gun legislation. Think Virginia. How's your ammo prices? How's those 22's??

Who was the Att General? Well, no never mind suffice to say 4 of the last 7 AG's have been (D).

Must be ''middle state''...maybe ''state of mind'' OGA perhaps; but what about the chief LEO of the state, the AG????

Well ppl in Ohio do elect (D)'s...from time to time...for various reasons & seasons, enough to point out that no dynasties last forever regardless how many time we recycle Blackwell,DeWine, Husted, Blackwell, what ever happened to Bachelder . And, where's Cordray(D) these days 8)

Out of Ohio Political History 203...back to topic...I dont want to have them obtain office, then hook up wit their buddies from sickle & hammer land, and say...''JUST DO IT" like DiFi. Because we gave them inroads to areas they already want to change. For a hiccup of a reciprocity issue....
Acquisitions thus far:

-Slingshot
-Butter knife
-Soda straw and peas
-Sharpened pencil
-Newspaper roll
--water balloon (*diversionary*)

Yeah, I'm that good
Tweed Ring
Posts: 17812
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:15 am

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by Tweed Ring »

I cannot comment on all of the above, but I do know Former Ohio AG Cordray is now Director of the Consumer Financial Protection with the Obama Administration, and Speaker Batchelder has been tagged by those pesky Ohio term limits.

I believe Batchelder may retire into the private sector, and Director Cordray may have political ambitions in the future, if the political winds are more favorable in Ohio.
User avatar
Werz
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 5506
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:37 am

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by Werz »

Tweed Ring wrote:I believe Batchelder may retire into the private sector ...
I wish he would come back to the Ninth District Court of Appeals. He always fed me good questions during oral argument.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."
-- Robert A. Heinlein, Beyond This Horizon
"Remember that protecting our gun rights still boils down to keeping a majority in the electorate, and that our daily activities can have the impact of being ambassadors for the gun culture ..."
-- BobK
Open carry is a First Amendment exercise.
User avatar
color of law
*** Banned ***
Posts: 3623
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Cincinnati area

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by color of law »

I wish Judge Mark P. Painter would come back to the first district. You always knew where he stood.

Klein v. Leis, 99 Ohio St.3d 537, 2003-Ohio-4779 http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/ ... o-4779.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.judgepainter.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
sd790
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:40 pm
Location: Delaware

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by sd790 »

Does this still need to be a sticky?
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
User avatar
djmac1964
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 3138
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Brook Park OH

Re: Why HB 203 Must Not Incorporate Federal Law

Post by djmac1964 »

sd790 wrote:Does this still need to be a sticky?
Probably not.
Don M
U S Army Veteran 84-91
OFCC Patron Member
NRA Life Member
ORPA Member
WVCDL Member
NRA Certified Basic Pistol Instructor / RSO


Want to become more active with OFCC, and the fight for your rights? Click the link to find out how!
http://ohioccwforums.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=64852
Post Reply