Now, I'd presume since the city owns and maintains the cemetery, as well as enforces all their rules, regulations, etc. this would be a pretty clear violation of ORC 9.68. I'd also presume that if any municipality should know better, it would be Clyde(or Cleveland as well).951.02 ACTIVITIES ON CEMETERY GROUNDS PROHIBITED.
(a) Carrying of firearms, except for ceremonial purpose, is prohibited.
You would think Clyde would know better...
Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators
Forum rules
This sub-forum is strictly for the purpose of submitting of, and status updates related to, ORC 9.68 compliance. This could mean park bans, open carry bans, or anything that is a compliance issue. Note the format in which original threads were created. We'll track each individual case here and post updates if assistance is needed, etc. You may start a new thread here to notify us of a non-compliant scenario. Please try to research contact information for each city, village, etc, Email, fax, and postal addresses are great. Digital photos of infractions (Signs) are ideal. With limited exceptions this is NOT a discussion forum.
READ THIS BEFORE POSTING
This sub-forum is strictly for the purpose of submitting of, and status updates related to, ORC 9.68 compliance. This could mean park bans, open carry bans, or anything that is a compliance issue. Note the format in which original threads were created. We'll track each individual case here and post updates if assistance is needed, etc. You may start a new thread here to notify us of a non-compliant scenario. Please try to research contact information for each city, village, etc, Email, fax, and postal addresses are great. Digital photos of infractions (Signs) are ideal. With limited exceptions this is NOT a discussion forum.
READ THIS BEFORE POSTING
- JustJack
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:17 am
- Location: Findlay
- Contact:
You would think Clyde would know better...
But I actually found an ordinance on the books that violates ORC 9.68. According to their Codified Ordinances found on ConwayGreeneCo.
IANAL, YMMV, other standard disclaimers, yada, yada, yada, etc, ad nauseum, in infinitum.
"If stupidity was painful, I would be deaf from all the screaming." - Samuel A. Grim
"If stupidity was painful, I would be deaf from all the screaming." - Samuel A. Grim
-
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Ashland County, OH
Re: You would think Clyde would know better...
we REALLY need to get working on giving 9.68 some teeth... (and I'd prefer if it was expanded to cover knives and other common arms)
- JustJack
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:17 am
- Location: Findlay
- Contact:
Re: You would think Clyde would know better...
I know man, I agree completely. In a perfect world we'd all just have Constitutional Carry and the anti's could suck on it.BriKuz wrote:we REALLY need to get working on giving 9.68 some teeth... (and I'd prefer if it was expanded to cover knives and other common arms)
IANAL, YMMV, other standard disclaimers, yada, yada, yada, etc, ad nauseum, in infinitum.
"If stupidity was painful, I would be deaf from all the screaming." - Samuel A. Grim
"If stupidity was painful, I would be deaf from all the screaming." - Samuel A. Grim
-
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Ashland County, OH
Re: You would think Clyde would know better...
Funny thing, Clyde still has a ban in parks...
955.07 PROHIBITION OF DEADLY WEAPONS IN CITY PARKS.
(a) No person located within the confines of any City Park shall knowingly carry or have, on or about his person or readily to hand, any deadly weapon, irrespective of whether such person has been issued a license to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to Ohio R.C. 2923.125 or pursuant to a comparable provision of the law of any other state.
I thought we won a court case about this? Where's the writ of Mandamus against the City Council?
955.07 PROHIBITION OF DEADLY WEAPONS IN CITY PARKS.
(a) No person located within the confines of any City Park shall knowingly carry or have, on or about his person or readily to hand, any deadly weapon, irrespective of whether such person has been issued a license to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to Ohio R.C. 2923.125 or pursuant to a comparable provision of the law of any other state.
I thought we won a court case about this? Where's the writ of Mandamus against the City Council?
- JustJack
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:17 am
- Location: Findlay
- Contact:
Re: You would think Clyde would know better...
That copy of the ordinances is Certified as of January 2013 as well, so they can't claim that they haven't updated them since prior to the lawsuit either.BriKuz wrote:Funny thing, Clyde still has a ban in parks...
955.07 PROHIBITION OF DEADLY WEAPONS IN CITY PARKS.
(a) No person located within the confines of any City Park shall knowingly carry or have, on or about his person or readily to hand, any deadly weapon, irrespective of whether such person has been issued a license to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to Ohio R.C. 2923.125 or pursuant to a comparable provision of the law of any other state.
I thought we won a court case about this? Where's the writ of Mandamus against the City Council?
IANAL, YMMV, other standard disclaimers, yada, yada, yada, etc, ad nauseum, in infinitum.
"If stupidity was painful, I would be deaf from all the screaming." - Samuel A. Grim
"If stupidity was painful, I would be deaf from all the screaming." - Samuel A. Grim