Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
Moderators: Chuck, Mustang380gal, Coordinators, Moderators
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:33 pm
Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
Went there this evening, and it's clearly posted at the entrance and on signs throughout the casino.
Just in case any of you were wondering,
Just in case any of you were wondering,
- BobK
- Posts: 15602
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:26 pm
- Location: Houston TX (formerly Franklin County)
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
IIRC, the new gambling regulations require a casino to post.
I am a: NRA Life Member, Texas State Rifle Association Life Member, Texas Firearms Coalition Gold member, OFCC Patron Member, former JFPO member (pre-SAF).
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
More Obamination. Idiots. Can't we find an electable (R) for 2016?
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
More Obamination. Idiots. Can't we find an electable (R) for 2016?
-
- Posts: 16229
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:42 pm
- Location: SW Ohio
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
BobK wrote:IIRC, the new gambling regulations require a casino to post.
Is there a law enforcement exemption of some kind in those regs, Bob? (Doesn't really matter to me but I know of a couple situations from other states where that kind of exception wasn't helpful.)
One was an Ohio cop visiting an Indiana casino and being intoxicated and armed while making threats because he'd been losing money all night. He was forcibly ejected but amazingly the Indiana State Police didn't arrest him, the casino took no further action.
The other (much worse) one was all over the news when it happened in Detroit: Drunk despondant LEO on a long losing streak does himself in with an off duty gun right at the blackjack tables.
My overall point being that if casinos don't want armed patrons it should apply across the board, or else they should at least consider allowing those legal to possess a gun to have it in their place of business.
Indiana at least always has state police on the property, as a trade off to being a statutory 'no carry zone'. Some inquiry on my part has determined that you can indeed get a statie to escort you to your vehicle if you happened to hit it big in the casino and insisted on taking the winnings in cash.
Quit worrying, hide your gun well, shut up, and CARRY that handgun!
********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
********************************************************************************
1911 and Browning Hi Power Enthusianado.
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 7:17 am
- Location: Johnstown, OH
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
I didn't see any, but I also wasn't looking because I already knew they were going to be posted from previous discussion.
Too many slots machines, table minimums are too high (lowest is $15), and no video blackjack or poker that I could find If I do go back, it'll only be to try the food.
Too many slots machines, table minimums are too high (lowest is $15), and no video blackjack or poker that I could find If I do go back, it'll only be to try the food.
Ruger P95 9mm
More to come, I'm sure.
More to come, I'm sure.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:33 pm
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
I didn't gamble a single dollar, I just went and drank the free fountain drinks, and watched my broke friends turn a combined $300 into $2,000 on the roulette table.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:33 pm
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
I don't agree with it being across the board ban, because we all know that the criminals don't follow the laws. I'd feel better about an off-duty or an on-duty LEO carrying a firearm while I'm stripped of mine, so at least one other good guy has a gun.Brian D. wrote: Is there a law enforcement exemption of some kind in those regs, Bob? (Doesn't really matter to me but I know of a couple situations from other states where that kind of exception wasn't helpful.)
One was an Ohio cop visiting an Indiana casino and being intoxicated and armed while making threats because he'd been losing money all night. He was forcibly ejected but amazingly the Indiana State Police didn't arrest him, the casino took no further action.
The other (much worse) one was all over the news when it happened in Detroit: Drunk despondant LEO on a long losing streak does himself in with an off duty gun right at the blackjack tables.
My overall point being that if casinos don't want armed patrons it should apply across the board, or else they should at least consider allowing those legal to possess a gun to have it in their place of business.
Indiana at least always has state police on the property, as a trade off to being a statutory 'no carry zone'. Some inquiry on my part has determined that you can indeed get a statie to escort you to your vehicle if you happened to hit it big in the casino and insisted on taking the winnings in cash.
-
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:17 pm
- Location: Franklin County
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
So if I understand,you can not carry in the Casino even if you do not drink. Is that right? It thought there signs didn't apply if you had a cow license.
The world is a dangerous place to live... not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it. - Albert Einstein
Life Member NRA
Life Member North American Hunter
Life Member NRA
Life Member North American Hunter
- JediSkipdogg
- Posts: 10257
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:03 pm
- Location: Batavia
- Contact:
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
Incorrect. You are thinking of the liquor control signs.mdad wrote:So if I understand,you can not carry in the Casino even if you do not drink. Is that right? It thought there signs didn't apply if you had a cow license.
What I believe BobK is saying is the Ohio Casino Control Board (whatever they are truely called) has a regulation of no firearms in the casino. Just like alot of other cases, the OCCB thinks they have the legal authority to mandage that as a policy even though they are a polical agency of the state. They however should all be posted if carry is not allowed, whether or not they are is another issue.
Carrying Concealed Handguns - Signage Answers
Ohio Concealed Carry Classes in S/W Ohio
http://www.ProShootersTraining.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am not a lawyer. My answers are based on research, knowledge, and are generally backed up with facts, the Ohio Revised Code, or the United States Code.
Ohio Concealed Carry Classes in S/W Ohio
http://www.ProShootersTraining.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am not a lawyer. My answers are based on research, knowledge, and are generally backed up with facts, the Ohio Revised Code, or the United States Code.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 8:33 pm
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
No, you cannot carry even if you are not drinking alcohol.mdad wrote:So if I understand,you can not carry in the Casino even if you do not drink. Is that right? It thought there signs didn't apply if you had a cow license.
- RichN
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:33 pm
- Location: Southwest Ohio
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
My understanding is that casinos are not on the statutory CPZ list, so the burden is not on the CHL holder. But in order to get a casino license, you have to agree to post your casino. If the casino upholds their end of the bargain, their casino will be posted. At that point, the CHL holder who chooses to carry in the casino will be violating the law, as they would carrying in any posted business.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
"So this is how liberty dies; with thunderous applause."
- Senator Amidala (Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith)
- Benjamin Franklin
"So this is how liberty dies; with thunderous applause."
- Senator Amidala (Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith)
- cashman966
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Delaware, Ohio
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
No exemption for off duty, non special duty LEO.Brian D. wrote:
Is there a law enforcement exemption of some kind in those regs, Bob? (Doesn't really matter to me but I know of a couple situations from other states where that kind of exception wasn't helpful.)
One was an Ohio cop visiting an Indiana casino and being intoxicated and armed while making threats because he'd been losing money all night. He was forcibly ejected but amazingly the Indiana State Police didn't arrest him, the casino took no further action.
The other (much worse) one was all over the news when it happened in Detroit: Drunk despondant LEO on a long losing streak does himself in with an off duty gun right at the blackjack tables.
My overall point being that if casinos don't want armed patrons it should apply across the board, or else they should at least consider allowing those legal to possess a gun to have it in their place of business.
Indiana at least always has state police on the property, as a trade off to being a statutory 'no carry zone'. Some inquiry on my part has determined that you can indeed get a statie to escort you to your vehicle if you happened to hit it big in the casino and insisted on taking the winnings in cash.
OAC 3772-20-01 Security department.
So as written RichN is correct, it is up to the Casino to post.(D) Except for the following persons, no casino operator licensee or applicant shall permit firearms at a casino facility, as defined in division (C) of section 3772.01 of the Revised Code:
(1) Commission gaming agents;
(2) Law enforcement officers, as defined in sections 9.88, 109.71 and 2901.01 of the Revised Code, who are on duty and within their jurisdiction;
(3) Law enforcement officers who are hired by a casino operator licensee or applicant for special duty as long as the officers are not specifically involved in gaming related regulatory functions; and
(4) Security guard providers, as defined by section 4749.01 of the Revised Code, who:
(a) Are not employed by the casino operator licensee or applicant;
(b) Are licensed under section 4749.03 of the Revised Code;
(c) Meet the requirements in section 4749.10 of the Revised Code; and
(d) Work for and are on duty with an armored motor vehicle security service licensed under section 4749.03 of the Revised Code.
It is interesting to note that all casino employees are barred from being armed as well, all casino employed security is to be unarmed (except special duty LEO).
Ignorant or Stupid, I'm not sure which is worse. If someone were stupid, at least they'd have an excuse for all the dumb things they say.
Pass the Peace Pipe I need another hit
IANAL and neither are most people on this board, its just shows more with some than others.
Pass the Peace Pipe I need another hit
IANAL and neither are most people on this board, its just shows more with some than others.
- Werz
- OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:37 am
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
Exactly. That's how they dodge R.C. 9.68. The commission doesn't directly ban firearms in the casino. They just dictate that, if the casino owner wants to keep a license, the casino owner must ban firearms on the premises.RichN wrote:My understanding is that casinos are not on the statutory CPZ list, so the burden is not on the CHL holder. But in order to get a casino license, you have to agree to post your casino. If the casino upholds their end of the bargain, their casino will be posted. At that point, the CHL holder who chooses to carry in the casino will be violating the law, as they would carrying in any posted business.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."
-- Robert A. Heinlein, Beyond This Horizon
"Remember that protecting our gun rights still boils down to keeping a majority in the electorate, and that our daily activities can have the impact of being ambassadors for the gun culture ..."
-- BobK
Open carry is a First Amendment exercise.
-- Robert A. Heinlein, Beyond This Horizon
"Remember that protecting our gun rights still boils down to keeping a majority in the electorate, and that our daily activities can have the impact of being ambassadors for the gun culture ..."
-- BobK
Open carry is a First Amendment exercise.
-
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:17 pm
- Location: Franklin County
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
Sounds like a bunch of B/S to me.
The world is a dangerous place to live... not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it. - Albert Einstein
Life Member NRA
Life Member North American Hunter
Life Member NRA
Life Member North American Hunter
- wkdravenna
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:08 pm
- Location: Toledo Ohio
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
In Indiana, Casino Security will allow you use of a lock-box where you can lock you're firearm up.
My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. - JFK
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:55 am
- Location: Columbus
Re: Hollywood Casino - Columbus is posted
I don't see the difference. It amounts to a de facto ban when they require that in order to legally operate a business, one must ban firearms. And that is the way I would argue it in court.Werz wrote:Exactly. That's how they dodge R.C. 9.68. The commission doesn't directly ban firearms in the casino. They just dictate that, if the casino owner wants to keep a license, the casino owner must ban firearms on the premises.RichN wrote:My understanding is that casinos are not on the statutory CPZ list, so the burden is not on the CHL holder. But in order to get a casino license, you have to agree to post your casino. If the casino upholds their end of the bargain, their casino will be posted. At that point, the CHL holder who chooses to carry in the casino will be violating the law, as they would carrying in any posted business.
Of course, since I don't give a flying #@$% about gambling, and I wouldn't want to be the test case, it is purely an academic thought.